Ranchi: Slamming the Central Investigation Bureau (CBI) for “Weaknesses” in investigating the murder of Dhanbad Judge Uttam Anand, the Jharkhand High Court observed that it seems that the agency tried to step down from allegations.
The chairman of the chairman of the Chief Judge Ravi Ranjan and Justice SN Prasad, read the Narco analysis test report from the two defendants, on Friday said that when his automatic driver and his accomplice knew that a judge before hitting him, how could CBIs produce murder theory for robbing cellphones? Refusing the CBI theory, the bench said that the agency failed down under the problem.
“Investigation of cases raises questions about the credibility of the CBI.
It seems that the agency is now bored with this case and wants to get out of the investigation, which is why it makes the stories so that the defendant is not charged.
Murder.
The probe will occur in such a way that it seems that the CBI tries to protect the defendant, “The bench said.
Narco analysis test report was read in court.
In the report, the driver assistant of the Autorickshaw Rahul said, “Lakhan drove an autorickshaw quickly.
I sat on the left.
The judge jog slowly.
He has a handkerchief in his left hand.
Lakhan beat the judge intentionally and he fainted on the ground.” Report It found that someone commissioned them the task to kill the judge.
Bench said that when the Narco analysis test report carried out by the CBI said that the two defendants knew the previous judge and they did not find their cellphone, how could the investigation body say that he was killed for cellphones? With CBI planning to test other Narco analysis, the bench wondered if there was a need for other tests like that after four months and if the report was contrary to the previous one, which would be trusted? The CBI previously presented a map showing the Morning Judge route, and stated that the entire area was under the supervision of CCTV, and all active cellphones in the area at that time were examined but there was no communication found between the defendant and others.
It was said that the defendant had not made a reception before hitting the judge, and no automatic rickshaw stopped among whoever did not contact them.
But the court said that the way the judge was killed, the defendant seemed to have done the previous reception.
The court said that even after the past for months since the incident on July 28 last year, the inability of the CBI to cover cases with logical conclusions raises questions about the credibility of agency.
It was said that the incident gradually moved towards the hit-and-run case.
“Jharkhand has been influenced by militancy but has never before the judge is under threat.
The incident has attracted the attention of the entire nation.
The court wants that the main conspirator was brought to order and convicted because the incident did not repeat.” It said.
The additional lawyer General SV Raju, almost appeared for the CBI from Delhi, said that the National Investigation Agency (NIA) Besides CBI is also a very competent agent and this case can be handed over to him, where the CBI tried whether the CBI tried to get out of the investigation.