LONDON: The US government will appeal the decision of British judges to block the founder of Wikileaks Julian Assange to face the trial to publish military secrets.
In the two-day hearing, Washington will ask the High Court to overcroll Vanessa Baritser district judge ruling January which Assange is a serious suicide threat if extradited across the Atlantic.
The United States said it was “very disappointed” on his decision, debating the judge “did not appreciate the weight” of the evidence of experts who said Assange was not at risk of suicide.
His lawyer has argued that Baraitser was “misled” in evidence of Assange Michael Kopelman psychiatric experts, which they claimed hidden things like that his client had father’s children when hiding at the Ecuador Embassy in London.
During the preliminary hearing in August, the High Court gave a request for the US government to appeal against the verdict on five reasons.
Anything that was decided by two senior court judges, months if not many years of flies further legal disputes.
If the US appeal is successful, this case will be sent back to a lower court for new decisions.
And anyone who loses can also ask permission for further final appeal to the British Supreme Court.
Assange, 50, was arrested in England in 2019 for jumping guarantees after spending seven years in the Ecuador embassy to avoid extradition to Sweden where he faced allegations of sexual violence.
This is then dropped.
Apart from the blocked extradition, he has been denied guarantees waiting for US appeals, amid fears he will escape.
He was detained at the London High-Security Belmarsh Prison, whose fiance Stella Moris – a former member of his legal team who was the mother of two children – this week was branded by “terrible environment”.
Assange desired in Washington to face 18 charges relating to the 2010 release by Wikileaks by 500,000 secret files detailing aspects of the military campaign in Afghanistan and Iraq.
He has been charged for violating US espionage laws and to hack, based on alleged aid, he gave the former Chelsea Manning military intelligence officer in obtaining safe documents from a safe military computer system.
If punished in the US, he faced a maximum sentence of 175 years in prison.
Baraiters said it was not clear that Washington would be able to ensure his salvation in a US prison known for “harsh conditions” while he was waiting for the trial.
He rejected the testimony of US experts that Assange would be protected from self-damage, noting that other people such as US heating humiliated Jeffrey Epstein had managed to commit suicide in detention.
Australia’s National Assange has a supporting vocal campaign, led by Moris and its legal team.
Moris said on Monday that he had visited Assange in prison last weekend and was surprised by how thin he saw.
“He looks very unhealthy,” he said.
“The point is that Julian will not survive the extradition, that’s the conclusion of the judge.” Carl Tobias’s legal expert, from the University of Richmond in Virginia, said there were “several occasions” from the US who won their appeal.
“The US might be able to convince the high court that Baraitser sets too heavy” for Kopelman’s report, he told AFP.
“However, even if the High Court agrees with US disputes which he thinks is too large for expert reports, which may not be enough to guarantee the whole decision,” he added.
Journalists of the unlimited advocacy group have urged President Joe Biden to bring down this case, on the grounds that the founder of Wikileaks has been “targeted at his contribution to reporting public interests”.
Assange was sought after, but failed, to get forgiveness from the predecessor of Biden Donald Trump, whose 2016 election campaign benefits from the release of Wikileaks that damaged his democratic opponent, Hillary Clinton.