New Delhi: The root of the Supreme Court landmarks over the amendment of the 102st Constitution may have kicked a storm because it doubled their power countries to identify the mandal caste for orders in the state employment and related goals, but the decision appeared deeper: including things , it may have a direct effect on the ongoing study on “OBCS” sub-categorization sub “.
In addition to submitting the power to identify the “list of OBC countries” to the Government of Trade Union, the three judges in the Constitutional bench also commented on the existence in the future “single list” OBC – the ordered by SC must be issued by.
The President (Government) on the recommendation of the National Commission for the Backward class.
The verdict about having a “single list”, which according to many people is interpreted as a merging of the central list and list of countries, has brought a job on “OBC sub-categorization” stops.
JK Bajaj, a member of the Rohini Justice Commission assigned to the sub-categorization of the CENTER OF OBC, to TOI, “Three Judges at SC Bench have said that there must be a list of OBC.
It implies a list of centers and a list of countries must be combined.
We need clarity about the problem this.
Until this problem is resolved, reports on sub-categorization cannot be provided.
“In the post-mandal reservation scheme, there are two OBCS – centers and countries, with the former identified by the United States who deal with the quota in the central work, while listing The state is the state government mandate that serves local bookings.
As reported by Toi, Thaawarchand Gehlot, who had just left the charge of the Ministry of Social Justice, said the government pondered the change in the 102st constitutional amendments to ensure that the state defends the right to identify mandal casting for the country list.
Given the SC ports on “single list” and its influence on many problems including subcategorization, the government may have to adjust the proposed amendments in such a way that concerns overcome by the Rohini Commission are also taken care of.
Or, the Government Government can think of seeking clarification from the APEX court on the “single list” OBC.
Rohini panel mandate “sub-categorization” involves divisions from the Central List of the OBC into caste groups, and distributed 27% mandal reservations between them.
This scheme is designed with ideas that should ensure the distribution of the benefits of a fair reservation among the caste groups by neutralizing the chances of monopolizing affirmative actions by several dominant groups that allow the central list.
Clarify the comment of the Supreme Court about the ‘Single’ List of OBC: Panel
