New Delhi: Even when the CBI and Ed are both investigating the MP TMC Abhishek Banerjee in the case of a coal scam, the Government of Mamata Banerjee has increased state disputes before the Supreme Court accusing the center and probative institutions to violate the country’s federal structure.
By registering a case in West Bengal despite the withdrawal of general approval.
Appears for the country, senior advocate Sidharth Luthra on Wednesday sought an urgent hearing of the original lawsuit submitted by the state based on Article 131 of the Constitution and told the Head of Justice NV Ramana, and as Bopanna that even after three years of interest that attracted general approval to the CBI For registration of cases related to incidents in West Bengal, the Central Agency continues to violate the structure of the federal government by Suo Motu registering a case.
West Bengal said that it has attracted general approval in 2018, but even after the CBI has registered as many as 12 cases related to incidents that occur in the state.
The Government of Mamata Banerjee said that laws and order and police are constitutionally placed under the exclusive jurisdiction of states and that registration of cases by illegal CBI and violations of the power of distributing constitutionally between the center and countries.
Among the 12 CBI cases quoted by the State is a suspected fraud of multi-crore coal theft related to the Western Western Balat Mine Ltd where, based on the CBI case, ED has registered a case in the prevention of money laundering law and called TMC MP Abhishek Banerjee His wife Rujo.
Abhishek has denied the allegations.
The agency also arrested Vikas Mishra, Brother of TMC Youth Wing Leader Vinay Mishra who allegedly left the country and left Indian citizenship.
The CBI has litigated in SC for the legitimacy of the cage in the case of a coal scam which is thought to occur in the railroad area under the control of the central government.
The West Bengal government is fighting CBI claims in that case.
Nonetheless, the state decided to file a lawsuit and said, “From the reading of the law, it is clear that the CBI does not have jurisdiction inherent in any area in the circumstances including the train area …
without the approval state,” he said.
Another example of the WB government includes the CBI case against the former Chancellor of Chancellor Visva Bharati, Shantiniketan, because of the alleged misuse of money, registration of the case of Calcutta HC complaints about the forgery of the documents and the incident of the livestock smuggling involved the BSF commander.
The state said the CBI can register cases in countries, which have attracted general approval under Section 6 of the DSPE Law, only when there is direction to central agents in this case by the Constitutional Court.
The CBI is not constitutional to seize power in the state and its police by continuing to register cases in West Bengal, said the Government of Mamata Banerjee.