Mumbai: Tribal Rights Activist Fr Stan Swamy, taken from Ranchi’s house last October, was the last of the arrest in the case of Elgar Paracades – and a half).
The oldest from the 16th year was accused, his request remained one of the innocence; He has struggled for his freedom by reason of illness and Parkinson.
The National Investigation Agency (Nia) who arrested him the day before he was demanded, opposed his guarantee application claiming that the investigation “set ‘him to become a member of CPI (Maoist) and was actively involved in his activities” and also” in contact with several conspirators – Sudhir Dhavale, Rona Wilson, Surendra Gadling, Arun Ferrera, Vernon Gonsalves, Hany Babu, Shoma Sen, Mahest Raut, Varavara Rao, Sudha Bharadwaj, Gautam Navalakha and Anand Teltumbel, etc.
from their activities.
” In the order of March 22, Judge of the Special Nia Court de Kothalikar, rejected his request for a bail on Merit, said he was accused of having the property of “terrorist organizations” and conspiring to defeat the government, politically and by.
Use muscle strength.
The court said the “community collective interests” would be greater than the right of personal freedom and old age swamy or alleged disease would not benefit it.
Judge Kothalikar said that from documents produced by Nia, it can be collected that Swamy and other members of the CPI banned (Maois) have hatched conspiracies to trigger riots and defeat the government.
Swamy is carrying out activities to advance organizational goals that are none other than to overthrow the “national democracy”, the court is held.
The court order also said, “If the seriousness of the accusation of the applicant is considered in the right perspective …
there will be no doubt to conclude that the collective interests of the community will be greater than the applicant’s personal freedom and the old age and or or alleged illness, From the applicant will not benefit him, “said the court.
FR Swamy’s fight is that the accusation of being a Maoist did not call for a long time.
He also pleaded that he was not present at Pune at the Elgar Parishad on December 31, 2017, he was also not mentioned in the FIRD January 8, 2018 submitted by Pune Police.
The main push of the defense was on the “entry of the document”, that Nia relied on the evidence of “Hearsay” to connect it.
The case is that nothing was confiscated from him and he was “not involved in anti-national activities ”.
Nia also refers to” exchange “around 140 emails between fr Swamy and together accused, and the fact that Swamy, with Sudha Bhardwaj and Members Another political prisoners who were persecuted by the Solidarity Committee (PPSC) had condemned the beliefs of Professor GN Saibaba and others under the UPA for the Maoist link.
The case is that the letters quoted by prosecution “did not specify that they were actually sent ” and authorship They are uncertain.
Swamy actively helps tribes and ‘moolvasis’, has established an organization called Baganacha, and has written and researched widely about the problem of caste, religion, land rights and their people’s struggle, the petition said.
His request is that the role of PPSC is to provide legal assistance and it is not offended.
But Nia claimed that she was “supporters of the sin of organizational activities such as Virodhi Jan Vikas Andolan (VVJVA) …
the frontal CPI organization (Maois).” Nia argued, and the court court agreed, that such an argument on evidence could be considered during the trial and therefore denied the guarantee in March, at achievement.
‘Community interests exceed Swamy Rights for Liberty’
