Mumbai: Much went down in Cid countries for the delay in the trial of the death case of Khwaja Yunus Khwaja Yunus, the court session on Friday said that it would be a jaunting justice that no one heeded his instructions since 2014.
“Even though repeated notifications and a letter to the investigation body, no There were actions taken to pursue cases that were heard where four police officers were accused of, “said the court.
Hummying Waze API Sachin is the one accused.
The trial had stopped SI-NCE 2018 after the Special Public Prosecutor (SPP) Dhiraj Mirajkar was suddenly removed; There is no appointments made since then.
“Why is there no rep-ort progress in this case …
when there is another [case].
This is suspicious,” said the judge more.
A software engineer, Yunus was arrested in the case of the Bus Bus Bus Ghatkopar 2002.
Waze and his team claimed that Yunus had fled, but in 2017, a doctor who was released, a doctor who taught forensics in medical colleges, told the court told him Have seen Yunus being brutally attacked in detention and vomiting on January 6 at 6 Janus 2003.
During the hearing on Friday, Taloja Prison officials said Waze could not attend virtual hearing because he had gone before the Judicial Commission for another hearing.
Nia had caught Waze in March in scare ambani bombs and the murder case of Mansukh Hiran.
Turn off defense requests to produce Waze directly, the court said he had to be produced through video conferencing without failing on the next date.
State Cid Police Inspector Maruti Jagtap, who was called to court, was submitted that despite efforts in 2018 and 2021, there was no community from the state government in response to the Korespo-ndence sent for Bowme-NT spp.
“What are these concrete steps? You have to chase …” The Judge shot back.
“I have read Roznama for 4 hours and found that there was no step taken.” The court showed that two previous SPP had been appointed and both had resigned.
It added that it was also a serious problem that even though there was a repeat direction to produce a diary station, no one was considered paid.
“Why did the case jam when there was no stay from the Supreme Court or Bombay High Court,” asked the judge.
The court also regretted that because the case was delayed for a decade, Witne-SSES memory might be affected.
The head of the Public Prosecutor, who was called, said the case was also delayed because of the locking and cid of the state now pursuing this problem.
“What did they pursue? At least some officers had to come …
Nothing appeared.
Isn’t that suspicious,” said the court.
Prosecution and Jagtap convinced the court that a senior cid officer would be present on each date.
A month is sought to pursue a problem regarding the appointment of SPP.
The court said the call must be published to Ms.
Yunus Ashiya Begum to understand the nature of the petition in SC and HC.
Defendant and Constable Rajendra Tiwari, Rajaram Nikam and Sunil Desai – suspended in 2004 were restored last year.