Chennai: There is no doubt of children addicted to games and mobile phones online, but the court cannot order regulations on the betasis of the personal morality of the applicant or judge, said Madras High Courges.
“This is not for restrictions on thecourttoimphose,” said the first bench of the Head of Justice Sanjib Banerjee and Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy.
However, the bench is added that the court can stepp out if the executive fails to act on any representative made in this matter.
The court made observations on Thursday at the public interest petition submitted by E Martin Jayakumar, represented by Advocates Selvi George, to direct the United States to regulate adverse online games for children and adolescents.
“There is no doubt that young children and adults have lately addicted to their phones and their worlds that appear to spin around their cellphones.
Often, a family can be together and sit in members who can be used using telephone, even if To describe the dish (they) may satisfy the quality of the food at the moment, “Bench said.
However, even the Constitutional Court must slowly enter the area and deal with such things on the personality of the morality of individual complains or judges or judges concerned, the court asserts.
Note that there is no doubt that when there are some illegal actions or something that harms a greater public interest, the constitutional court interference, the judges say, “Butin business like that, especially when the government was elected, such a policy must be submitted to their wisdom Representing the people and have their mandate instead of the court issuing dictates.
“Internally above thefailure of actionExecutiveto acts and, after that, the court understands this problem to be a danger to the community, that the court must enter, they said.
The court added, “At least at the initial stage, court assignments are directing complainants to executives for healthier policy decisions and learning to be taken by the executive than what might happen before the court.” Before separating, the court said the intricacies of the threat that the applicant complained and greater matches or a greater or long-term time had in children and young adults had not yet entered into large details in this process, especially in the absence of scientific material.
Getting out of be careful, the judges then explain that there is not in the order that will prevent further complaints about the problems brought to court, if the executive fails to take appropriate action.