New Delhi: Registered Cases in connection with the alleged Covid-19 protocol in Nizamuddin Markaz- where the Congregation of Tabligh Jamaat was held in March last year in the middle of a pandemic – serious and had “cross-border implications”, said the Delhi High Court Center which commented on Monday It cannot be locked forever.
Judge Mukta Gupta, who heard the Application for the Council of Waqf Delhi to reopen Markaz which was closed since March 31 last year, questioned the center how long to keep Nizamuddin Markaz locked, said it was impossible “saved forever”.
Advice for the center states that legal action to reopen Markaz can only be initiated by property tenants and residents where has submitted a request to hand over the Markaz housing section, which is waiting for the final adjudication before another judge of the High Court.
“Only at the legal view, the petition can be discarded.
The waqf board does not have the power to go beyond the tenant,” said the advice for the center of the nair.
However, the judge said, “Some people have the property.
Because of the pandemic, registered FIR.
(And) you take US ownership of property.
It must be submitted.
It is not possible that the property is saved forever (subject to a court order).
What is your stand about facts – The fact of this case? You told me from who you took it.
How long you will make it locked as a case property.
“The court issued a notification of the application submitted by Markaz Management Committee members who were questioned for their dreams and allowed the welfare board to submit the answer to Affidavit The center and post this problem for the next hearing on November 16.
Senior Ramesh Gupta adviser, representing the Board, argues that the petition remains delayed for more than one and a half years and clarifies that its application is related to the release of the entire Markaz property consisting of mosques, Madarasa and housing parts.
“Now they have to let go of our property.
Uoi doesn’t have a role to play,” he said.
Salman Khurshid’s senior advisor represents members of the intervention, adding that he “on the same page as waqf” and when left reopened, Markaz will comply with the relevant protocol.
In a statement of his statement was confirmed by the Deputy Commissioner of the Police, the crime, the Center has stated that “necessary and continuous” to “preserve the property of Markaz as an investigation in the case listed for violations of the Covid-19 protocol has” cross border implications and involves state diplomatic relations With other countries.
“” Thus, given the seriousness of the case that has trans-border implications and diplomatic considerations, only and it is necessary that property cases in such cases are maintained in letters and spirits so that the legal process in dealing with such cases followed, “said Affidavit.
“Since around 1,300 foreigners were found to live in such places and cases against them have cross-border implications and involve the nation’s diplomatic relations with other countries, need and obligations in the respondent to maintain the place for this purpose part 310 CR.PC,” Add it.
It was said because the problem of keeping the markaz premise was locked was delaying adjudication before another bench, it “could not be exiled by the applicant (waqf) which corresponds to the power of the supervisor”.
It adds that the right to manage Markaz is subject to the law, public order and health and that the authorities have “always calm the norms in the right application made by people who manage religious affair” as and when the committee submits a request for a relaxation remembering every subsequent religious festival or for other reasons.
On April 15, the court has permitted 50 people offering Namaz five times a day in Nizamuddin Markaz during Ramzan, said there was no direction in the notification of Delhi Disaster Management Authority (DDMA) to close the place of worship.
The Board, in the request submitted through Advocates Wajeeh Shafiq, argues that even after opening up-1 guidelines that are permitted to place religious places outside the detention zone to be opened, markaz – consisting of Bangley Guardian Mosque, Madarsa-installed hostel – ULO – – Keep locked.
It is increasingly arguing that even if the place is part of a criminal investigation or trial, keeping it remain “under the key as a non-bound area” is the “primitive method” of the investigation process.
Several FIR has been registered under the Epidemic Law, Disaster Management Law, Foreign Law and various provisions for criminal codes in connection with the Jamaat tabli program held in Markaz and the next time of the Lightdown Covid-19 last year.
Covid-19: Nizamuddin Markaz Case has cross-border implications, the Center tells HC
