New Delhi: Stepping out of the house to meet friends during Lowdown Covid last year led Suresh through the darkest episode of his life and put his family in trouble when he ended up in prison on charges of searching and looting shops during the Northeast of Delhi riots.
He was finally released by the court on Tuesday.
But at that time he spent 10 months in prison.
He got a guarantee on February 25 after being arrested by the police on April 7, 2020.
Sister Suresh Renu claimed that he was arrested by the police for not wearing a mask.
“Lockdown was underway and because my brother did not wear a mask, he was taken to the police station.
When my parents went there on the day, the police scolded them told them the importance of wearing a mask.” “The next day, they returned to the police station but found that he had been transferred to Tihar.
Two months later, we received a sheet of charge and surprised us, we found that a case of differher riots in my brother,” he claims.
Suresh’s arrest grabbed from his family of regular income sources.
His father moved a rented e-raging while his mother had been domestic aid, but after about six months of the disease last year, he had to give up his work.
Renu, drop out of school, is currently unemployed.
“We cannot provide a guarantee bond of RS 15,000 for my brother.
We just can’t afford it,” Renu said.
According to Advokat Rajiv Pratap Singh, who represented Suresh in court, the family struggled to survive solely on the income of the Father, which during Covid Curbs was uncertain.
“However, because of locking, limited family expenditure.
Renu used to get food for families from schools where free food was offered at that time.
They somehow,” said Singh.
The police earlier said that Suresh, was now released, along with a rioting crowd carrying iron rods and sticks, allegedly unlocked the store located on Jalan Babarpur Delhi and looted it on February 25.
On March 9, 2021, the cost of the discharge was under Section 143 (penalties for illegal assembly), 147 (Rioting), 427 (Mischief), 454 (Lurking House-Trespass) Read with Section 149 (Assembly Violating Law) and Section 395 ( Dakoitas) IPC.
Suresh claimed innocent and claimed to be a trial.
The additional session of Suresh Hakim Amitabh was treated on Tuesday said the prosecution was unable to prove his case against the defendant because there was no burdensome material that opposed it.
This was the first assessment in the case of riots broken in Northeast Delhi in February 2020 during anti-CAA protests.
The trial was underway in many cases relating to the violence that killed 53 people.
More than 700 injured people were injured during communal clashes.
Covid violations or riot cases?: Freed Humans Finally
