Pune: Special UPA Judge SR Navander on Friday was postponed until September 3, both to court or to be accused, a copy of the Director of the Gujarat Forensic Science Director relating to the firearm recovered from one of the alleged two shooters.
Veteran rationalist Narendra Dabholkar was shot dead exactly eight years ago on August 20, 2013, at the Vitthal Bridge Ramji Shinde near Balgandharva Rang Mandir at Pune by two attackers transmitted by two bicycles.
The Central Investigation Bureau (CBI), which took over investigations in 2014, was first arrested in June 2016 Panel-based ENT surgeon and Sanatan Sansha Virendrasinh Tawde, which, the institution has been described as the main conspirator.
Then, the agency captured Sachin Andure and Sharad Kalasascar, both of them were accused of opening a fire in Dabholkar, and lawyer Mumbai Sanjeev Punalekar and his assistant Vikram Bhave, both were charged with helping shooters in various activities related to crime.
Punalekar and Bhave since guarantees were given by the Bombay High Court.
The CBI has so far archived the Chargesheets against all five who were accused of more than a half years ago and this case had been delayed to frame the charges that marked the start of the trial which was a lot of awaited.
On Friday, when the argument over framing the accusation will begin, the Prakash Salsingikar lawyer, representing Bhave, transferred the request regarding Gujarat forensic report.
“We were taken to the notification of the Notification of the Bombay High Court from January 20, 2017, which relates to Gujarat Forensic Reports and said that the CBI must clarify its position on whether it rely on this report because of the same important for the defense to prepare the case,” Salsingsinsarsar said to Ti.
Prakash Public Prosecutor Prakash Suryavanshi told TII, “The Special Court Looking for Reasons from Defense Lawyers such as what legal provisions requested by Plea (for Forensic Reports) are being submitted.
The court asked for the defense to argue about documents based on the documents supplied by CBI .
the judge further brought to the notice of defense lawyers that the bail petition on behalf of the accused lodged in front of him (in Pune) and the Bombay High Court.
the judge asked the defense of the petition of the petition.
Pune and HC.
“Suryavanshi said,” the judge also observed that the defense it submits a new application (at any time) ) (B) (b) conspiracy), 302 (punishment for murder) and 34 (general intentions) from the code Indian Crime, 16 (Punishment for Terrorist Law) from Law Activities that violate the law (prevention) and the relevant parts of the arms law, among others.