New Delhi: The Delhi Court has fired a request for a 80-year-old man who looked for the declaration of his son’s death, which was allegedly killed during the 1984 anti-Sikh riot, saying he did not produce documents to prove that his son had even been there.
The court said it was a common sense and law problem that only someone who was known to have been in the first place could be declared dead.
The man was approaching a court seeking the civil death declaration of his son Ajit Singh and the procurement / issuance of death certificates from the office of the birth and death registrants concerned.
“Needless to say, before looking for a declaration that someone is dead, the Plaintiff has the responsibility to prove the existence of Ajit Singh, who wants to be declared to death.
Conversely, although there are questions by the court during the final argument, the Plaintiff does not raise any ID record from Ajit Singh or Any document that can satisfy the court about its identity and existence, “Helly Fur Kaur said on the order on Thursday.
The court noted that it was a recognized fact that no missing reports were available with the man because the police allegedly refused to register the same thing.
Owned by Delhi administration is misplaced.
According to the lawsuit submitted by the man, his son was allegedly lost during the 1984 anti-Sikh riots and his efforts to write a failure.
He handed over that it was a stale law that someone who had never been heard for seven years by those who naturally heard whether he was still alive must be suspected.
The lawsuit said that it was an obligation to submit here that the Plaintiff’s son had not been heard by anyone among family / relatives / friends since the riots, so his son was considered and declared dead.
Furthermore said that in terms of anything, for the issuance of a death certificate and to seek compensation, the Plaintiff needs to get the declaration of the civil death of his son.