New Delhi: Indicates that life is lost “with custodial violence” amid allegations of extortion by prison officials, the Delhi High Court on Wednesday was transferred to the CBI Probe in the alleged Gangster Ankit Gujjar, which was submitted in Tihar.
Justice Mukta Gupta took a gloomy view of the alleged family of Gujjar that he was beaten because of a failure to pay senior prison officials.
This, coupled with the fact that the prison doctor who examined Gujjar’s injury, was serious, failed to increase the alarm even when the prison staff prevented Delhi police police from taking a statement of prisoners before death, convincing the court that the CBI needed to be brought by the legal rule to ensure the right to prisoners in the Indian constitution .
This is a violation of the constitutional rights of Ankit Gujjar, which lost his life to custodial violence in Tihar prison, which has forced Geeta Applicants, Shivani and Ankul, Mother, sisters and brothers and sisters who have died Ankit Gujjar (respectively ), to submit a gift of petition, “The judge observed while directing that the case file was submitted by Delhi police to the CBI.
HC observed that if the allegations of extortion in prison were correct,” this is a very serious violation that requires a deep investigation “.
It shows that even When a family has also given the number of accounts transferred money, “All investigations, as seen from the process recorded in FIR because also the status report submitted, aims to show it because there is a cellphone recovery, charger and knife from the deceased cell, it is transferred , and when he refused to be transferred, a fight occurred, ignoring the origin of the origin l The emergence of money from Meena Narender which was not met because Ankit was beaten mercilessly “.
Justice Gupta also underlines that post-mortem “denies the versions” prison officials who are a fight where the two supervisors and Gujjar accepted injury.
HC said it was “unexpected” why the prison doctor failed to find several injuries, adding that the investigation needed was not only a brutal beating violation but also became “the role of the prison doctor did not provide the right treatment at the right time”.
The court also marked “Connivance / Laxity” from Deputy Prison Inspector, who did not allow the local police to enter into prison to ask PCR calls made in connection with the beating of the wajjar at night intervention 3-4.
.
This emphasizes the need for “direct improvement” to ensure “immoral officers” do not use non-functional CCTVs and ask the Director General (prison) to streamline the CCTV system in prison and submit a report.