Delhi: Improving “Error”, the Delhi High Court has been closed “with the direct effect” of all cases of the city where the question of minors in small violations has been delayed for more than one year before the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB).
TII previously reported the Delhi Commission for the protection of children’s rights had approached the court urging him to record around 1,900 minors in conflict with the law faced by the “criminal” tag, reported Abhinav Garg.
“We argue that even easier than an investigation into a child is stigmatically,” HC said.
Repariment of teenagers up to 44% in 6 months.
Division of the investigation has an impact on the dignity of a child and therefore this situation should not be continued, “Hakim Reserve Siddharth Mridul and Anup Jairam Bhambhani noted, adding direction towards” Fix errors in Judicial dispensation, because we believe there is no justification in keeping things like that waited longer ” The period was extended for a maximum of two months.
The provision said that if the investigation remained unfortunate, the process would be placed ended.
The bench specified in all cases “accused a small violation of children / adolescents, where the investigation has been delayed and still cannot be concluded more than one year, regardless of whether the child’s subject / teenager has been produced before JJB, all these questions will stand end with direct effects; Formal closure that closes all these things must be passed by JJBS in each file within two weeks from the date of this order, and every child / teenager is detained in relation to the question, will be immediately released without waiting to record formal orders.
“HC is adjusted for delays that occur due to pandemics, which means children are not produced by video conferencing.
It also marks the old process of adolescent verification.
The bench is further directed that children must be produced before JJB within 24 hours to become the subject of the process in Under the JJ Law, while noting that DCPCR data shows that the pendency figures for small violations have increased by 44% in just the last six months.
It deals with various problems related to the effective interpretation and implementation of several provisions of adolescent justice (maintenance and children’s protection) ACT 2015.
One of the problems raised is that Overlong LEPENCY from a small number of cases related to ‘ticik relating to’ ticik.
Violations are carried out by juvenile delinquency.
In cases of adolescents allegedly committing violations small, where the question is delayed between six months and Sat U Year, the bench directs the country to tell the number of such cases that are delayed in Delhi along with the date of the investigation institution and the first production date in each case, within 10 days of the date of this order to pass the corresponding direction.
The court also explained that the termination of the question according to its direction would not hinder the preparation and implementation of the necessary rehabilitation and the social reintegration plan as referred to in the Act.