New Delhi: Delhi High Court on Monday refused to guarantee a person accused of in the case of Northeast Delhi Riot in 2020, said that there was a “planned and pre-meditation conspiracy to disrupt the law and order in the city” and the event ” Not happening in the current internship “.
Judge Subramonium Prasad, while dealing with the guarantee application was transferred by one Mohd Ibrahim in the case of the alleged killing of the Delhi Police Chief of Ratan Lal, observing a systematic termination and destruction of CCTV cameras in areas near the place of incident and “countless rioters with cruelly lowered with sticks, Dandas, bats, etc.
After the cohort of police officers who were too much lose.
“The riots that rocked the national capital of the state in February 2020 clearly did not occur in spurring the moment, and the behavior of protesters present in video recordings had been placed On the note with the prosecution that was seen significantly that it was a calculated effort to separate the function of the government and disrupt the normal life of people in the city, “said the court.” The termination and systematic destruction of CCTV cameras also confirmed the existence of a planned and published conspiracy for disrupting the law and order in the city, “he added.
Destroying the implementation of Assurance Ibrahim, the court stated that the video recordings available showed the applicant with the sword “quite terrible” and enough to keep him in detention.
“Bidakal from the material on the record has revealed to the court that the Petitioner has been identified on several CCTV recordings, carrying a sword and inciting the crowd.
The proof that tilted the court to extend the detention of the applicant was a weapon that was being carried by the applicant was able to cause injury and / or / or Death is sad, and whether the prime facie of weapons is dangerous, “said the court.
Judge while acknowledging the importance of personal freedom in democratic government, clarifying that “individual freedom cannot be misused in a way that threatens a civilized fabric by trying to disrupt it and cause injured to others.” Even though the applicant cannot be seen in the crime scene, he is part of he is part.
” From the mass for the only reason that the applicant has consciously traveled 1.6 km from his neighborhood with a sword that can only be used to incite violence and cause damage, “the court said.
The Petitioner, Ibrahim, was arrested in December 2020 and had undergone Judicial custody Since then.
He sought guarantees on the ground so he never participated in any protest or riots at the point of time and the place on the record by prosecution did not place it near the crime scene.
Court, in a separate order, given a guarantee to one saleem Khan , with Men.
Express that in the absence of material to show that it is part of the assembly breaking the law at the crime scene, the truth of the accusation that is increased to it can be tested.
during the trial.