New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday said “Very impossible” to be persuaded by Delhi police to cancel the guarantee given to the Delhi riots accused of Kalita Devangan, Natasha Narwal and Asif Iqbal Tanha even when it made it uncomfortable on Delhi High Court Baily Bouy Hakyi “Unreasonable” interpreted the provisions of the Anti-Terror Law UPA and Nia.
Before the General Lawyer General Tushar Mehta and additional lawyers General Lekhi can open an argument on behalf of Delhi Police, who have been seeking to convey the assessment of Delhi HC’s assessment that gives assessment to the trio and even when the advice to be accused of seeking delays, the judicial bench of Sanjay Kaul and Hemant Gupta Ask, “What are your complaints (Delhi Police) – Grant of a bail or observation and legal interpretation by HC? Do you want to bring them back to custody?” Justice of the vows said, “Prima Facie of this observation was made by HC in the context of the case (plea guarantee three).” SG crossed to ask the judge not to make observations even before Delhi police opened his argument.
This Irked Hakim Caul, “This might be a political problem for you, not for us.
This is a simple guarantee problem.” However, Keimilan Kaul continues to say, “We agree that legal provisions do not need to be discussed and interpreted in the way that Delhi has done HC.
” Mehta and Lekhi said Delhi police would argue about both points – guarantees and observations that were unwarranted by HC – to go to the side of HC’s assessment.
“We are on both points and we will persuade the bench on both points,” said Mehta.
“Very impossible,” said the Judician Kaul, before dictating the command that two problems must be debated – the cancellation of the guarantee that will be based on the factual score; And the other related to the legal application of HC’s desire to interpret the provisions of UPA UPA and Nia while deciding a guarantee petition.
On June 18, SC has issued a notification to Kalita, Narwal and Tanha at the Delhi Regional Police appeal.
It refused to keep the HC sequence that gave them a guarantee but had expressed a surprise on the assessment of HC guarantee more than 100 pages and forbade it from being quoted by other accused in cases of riots to seek guarantees.
It is said, “What disturbs us is that in a guarantee petition, the HC writer is a 100-page assessment, and it also discusses all laws.
This is something very very surprising.
What we can say is that because guarantees have been given, those who are relief It will not be affected.
But, otherwise we will remain an effect of this sequence.
“SC postpones four weeks hearing, accessing the request of senior advocate of Kapil Sibal, which emerged for the defendant activist.
Sibal said these children did not have the means to print and translate documents that walked into 20,000 pages submitted together with Chargesheet by police Delhi.
“If Delhi’s police can give us a drive pen containing all documents, it will help us read it better,” he said.
Post-dictation commands, Keimilan Kaul stated that the inconvenience of Bench for the trend of advice has recently debated long hours in a guarantee and court trend by considering all the arguments to make a big assessment.
“That (trend) disturbs us.
Law and problems that are not relevant to grant problems or collateral rejection should not be debated.
We will strip only two hours for both parties in this matter to resolve their arguments when hearing continues,” said the court.
Delhi riots: cancellations of guarantees to activists are very unlikely, said SC
