New Delhi: Former member of the Jahan Congress Council, was arrested under strict activity (prevention) acting in a case of conspiracy related to the Northeast Delhi riots, on Friday to a city court that the suspicion that he incited Hindus not It would be suitable for him politically when he won from a chair where the two communities chose it.
Jahan, through his advice, told additional session Judge Amitabh was treated that the police had projected it as “Kattar” (hardline), but he had won from a chair where Muslims were a minority.
He further claimed that no Muslim who had won from the chair and his victory was due to his secular credentials.
Advocate Pradeep Teotia, appeared for Jahan, told the court, “He is the only woman who opposes a chair where a Muslim has never won before.
The two communities choose it.
It is dangerous for him to complain about Muslims.
Because of his secular credentials, he Winning.
It won’t be stable for it politically.
“Shows the pictures of Jahan who participated in the Hindu and Sikh procession, the lawyer said he did not bring the image of the” hardline “tried by the police.
“Why does he do it? There is no evidence of evidence that directly or indirectly with conspiracy.
He only wants one proof of prosecution based on which they can justify their actions to order them under UPA,” he added.
Teotia argues that there is a wrong intention to involve it in this case and prosecution shows evidence in little by little and not in totality.
“Ishrat has become a lawyer and a young political leader who represents India in Singapore, Malaysia, Myanmar, etc.
for the political conference of Asian leaders …
All witnesses shown to them in this case are planted …
the pattern of financial withdrawal and deposits has always become the same .
The police did not have qualitative evidence of it, “said the lawyer.
Referring to the recent order where Natasha Narwal student activists, Devangana Kalita and Asif Iqbal Tanha were given guarantees by the Delhi High Court, Teotia said whether Jahan was indeed a good conspirator, he could ask him to influence the witness to his name out of prison.
“He has a better foothold than those who get a guarantee from the High Court.
I challenged prosecution to show evidence that qualified him to be demanded under UPA,” Teotia said.