New Delhi: Court again attracted Delhi police because the delay in registering fir and “no progress in the investigation” in the complaint submitted by the alleged victim of the Northeast Delhi Riot.
This is a “truly affair”, a ruped court.
Additional Judge Vinod Yadav said it seems that this case did not get the attention of the Police Commissioner, Delhi police or “special investigation cells” were formed to monitor the ongoing probe in riot cases.
The police have exchanged the Ahmed Neseces complaint with two other complaints.
On April 26, 2021, the court had directed it to put forward a separate FIR picking on Ahmed complaints.
Three complaints were beaten into one FIR No 78/2020 at the Gokalpuri police station.
Complaints Aas Mohammad accused his shop robbed and burned by a horde of riots on February 25, 2020, while Shaheen accused that his house was robbed during the riots.
The third complaint was Ahmed, who claimed to have witnessed communal riots on two different dates, 24 and 25 February.
He further claimed that on both dates, he made several calls to the police, but it didn’t work.
He alleged that some people have installed a public address system and advises fellow members of their community to damage, robbing and burning houses and shops of people who have other communities.
On Tuesday, Yadav noted that FIR no.
134/2021 was registered at the Gokalpuri police station on June 7, 2021, after about two months of court orders.
The court shows that initial investigation officers (IO) and IO are currently present and both have proposed that “no progress in the investigation” has occurred.
“The people mentioned in FIR have not been interrogated.
This is truly a sorry.
It is claimed by the police in other cases of riots that the situation applies during the riots and almost four weeks after it is very difficult and the police cannot investigate The case correctly.
After that, Delhi is overwhelmed by the Coronavirus Pandemic and thus, the investigation of quality in this problem cannot occur.
I wonder if the police can take the same reason for the investigation into the case …
the answer must be ‘clearly not’, ” Judge said.
This is a matter of note that Ahmed has been shown as a witness in at least 11 riot cases in various blocks, the court shows.
His son stated in the case that “he hasn’t seen the riots that happened in the Block-A, like the place lies at a distance of more than half a kilometer of his house.
The same thing is the position in another case where he has shown as a witness”, it was observed.
Delhi Riots: Police Probe Tardy Drawing IRE Court
