Categories: Delhi

Delhi Riots: Police Probe Tardy Drawing IRE Court

New Delhi: Court again attracted Delhi police because the delay in registering fir and “no progress in the investigation” in the complaint submitted by the alleged victim of the Northeast Delhi Riot.
This is a “truly affair”, a ruped court.
Additional Judge Vinod Yadav said it seems that this case did not get the attention of the Police Commissioner, Delhi police or “special investigation cells” were formed to monitor the ongoing probe in riot cases.
The police have exchanged the Ahmed Neseces complaint with two other complaints.
On April 26, 2021, the court had directed it to put forward a separate FIR picking on Ahmed complaints.
Three complaints were beaten into one FIR No 78/2020 at the Gokalpuri police station.
Complaints Aas Mohammad accused his shop robbed and burned by a horde of riots on February 25, 2020, while Shaheen accused that his house was robbed during the riots.
The third complaint was Ahmed, who claimed to have witnessed communal riots on two different dates, 24 and 25 February.
He further claimed that on both dates, he made several calls to the police, but it didn’t work.
He alleged that some people have installed a public address system and advises fellow members of their community to damage, robbing and burning houses and shops of people who have other communities.
On Tuesday, Yadav noted that FIR no.
134/2021 was registered at the Gokalpuri police station on June 7, 2021, after about two months of court orders.
The court shows that initial investigation officers (IO) and IO are currently present and both have proposed that “no progress in the investigation” has occurred.
“The people mentioned in FIR have not been interrogated.
This is truly a sorry.
It is claimed by the police in other cases of riots that the situation applies during the riots and almost four weeks after it is very difficult and the police cannot investigate The case correctly.
After that, Delhi is overwhelmed by the Coronavirus Pandemic and thus, the investigation of quality in this problem cannot occur.
I wonder if the police can take the same reason for the investigation into the case …
the answer must be ‘clearly not’, ” Judge said.
This is a matter of note that Ahmed has been shown as a witness in at least 11 riot cases in various blocks, the court shows.
His son stated in the case that “he hasn’t seen the riots that happened in the Block-A, like the place lies at a distance of more than half a kilometer of his house.
The same thing is the position in another case where he has shown as a witness”, it was observed.

news2in

Share
Published by
news2in

Recent Posts

44 ordered to attack the procession

Ludhiana: The police have submitted FIR to four identified and at least 40 unknown attackers…

3 years ago

Punjab: Police Reject conspiracy theory in the case of Deep Sidhu

Sonīpat / Ludhiana / Ambala: Actor Punjabi - Activist Activist Deep Sidhu, who died in…

3 years ago

Punjab: Hidden Strength Working Behind PM Narendra Modi, Arvind Kejriwal, said Rahul Gandhi

PATIALA / MANSA / BARNALA: Attacking Prime Minister Narendra Modi and AAP National Convener Kejriawal,…

3 years ago

BJP made AAP to endanger the Congress, said Ajay

Jalandhar: BJP and AAM AAM AADMI parties are one party, Secretary General of the Ajay…

3 years ago

Our job is to make Punjab No. 1 State: Meenakshi Lekhi

Ludhiana: Minister of Union Culture Meenakshi Lekhi while campaigning to support the BJP candidate from…

3 years ago

Feb 20 is an opportunity to change the destiny of Punjab and his children: Bhagwant Mann

Machhiwara (Ludhiana): AAM AAM AADMI Party (AAP) Head of Punjab Candidate and Members of Parliament…

3 years ago