Mumbai: Referring to the observation of the Supreme Court that the former Minister of State House Anil Deshmukh and to feel Police Police Param Bir Singh work with confidence, the Bombay High Court on Wednesday asked the CBI if the probe was “broad-based” and looked into “Recovery of Sachin Waze as Inspector of police assistant last year.
The Committee returned Waze led by Singh.
Judge SS Shinde and NJ Jamadam said, “Anyone who is the administrative head at the relevant time cannot claim the helplessness or innocence.
It’s equally the task of such an officer to prevent it at the relevant time.
“HC heard the arrangement petition submitted by Deshmukh against the first information report (FIR) that enrolled against it and” the unknown person “by the CBI on April 21 under the prevention of corruption for non-pseudo profits.
CBI to HC: move with wisdom as a figure The public involved HC, hearing a request for dismissions by former Minister of State House Anil Deshmukh against FIR who was submitted against him and “Unknown Person” by the CBI under the prevention of corruption, in verbal exchanges with additional lawyers Secure Lekhi General for CBI, “What we are Expect from the CBI that a broad-based probe and that all responsible people will be ordered.
“Lekhi answered,” the investigation will be broad-based and includes everyone.
But for that, it must continue.
“HC said it had passed no temporary commandment to keep the probe so far.
Lekhi said the probe was not detained in any way, but it was a” multi-layer complex investigation “.
He said the CBI was” tracing the trend “and that” no exception will be made for anyone …
not as if the agency will play favorites “.
But, said Lekhi, HC command April April 5 for the Introduction Investigation Empower CBI to investigate the accusations against Deshmukh.
He added that as a public person involved,” the body Move with wisdom …
“If the Petitioner anticipates Chargesheet, then there is a feeling of guilt …
if not, he must be open to let the probe continue.
, “He added.
Lekhi said a pine was not expected to provide all the details, and the attachment must also be taken into account in the letters of Singh to CM against Deshmukh for the alleged” corrupt malpractice “and advocates Jaishri Patil’s complaints to quote Malabar Hill’s letter.
It accused That De-Shmukh has told Sachin Waze to collect RS 100 Crore every Mo-Nth of the restaurant and bar.
Amit Desai, senior adviser to Deshmukh, said, “Fir it does not have the average fact to suggest that Dishmu-KH commit violations Or that he received money.
“He added that even on June 11, in a written statement in HC, CBI never said he received money, it only accused” effort “and made a transfer claim and post with an undue influence without his body.
argues that Lett-er Singh “motivated because of his transfer” and contains “false claims”, and Deshmukh has resigned on “Mor land al “.