New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Wednesday searched for a response from the center, Delhi Police Commissioner and Director of the Director General of Police with pills who demanded strict action against those who gave hatred speeches, allegedly called for armed actions in the congregation in the congregation HariDwar and Delhi last month.
The advice of the Qurban Applicant Ali Kapil Sibal said he did not act to those who gave a speech to incite crimes against Muslims to encourage participants in the Scheduled Dharam Sansad meeting during the election period in Uttar Pradesh to indulge in the same speech and request head benches.
Justice NV Ramana and Judge Surya Kant and Hima Kohli to direct the police authorities concerned to take prevention steps.
The CJI LED bench in the order of saying, “Sibal proposed that several more events are being planned, where there might be a possibility of a particular inflammatory speech.
If so, the applicants are in Liberty to make representations, or bring them to notice, local authorities are related.” Sibal Said Dharam Sansad was first held in Haridwar between December 17-19 and the other was planned at Aligarh on January 23.
“We dealt with Dharam Sansads not only about mere hatred speech.
We don’t want Sansads Dharam people to happen.
Please listen to the petition on Monday,” he begged.
When the bench will provide ten days to responders to submit their response, said Sibal, “Sansads Dharam was announced every day and will be held in Una, Kurukshetra and Dasna in the midst of election of elections in these countries.
And because there is no action Those taken by the police against the perpetrators of such a kind of hatred incitizes violence, the country’s atmosphere operates.
This is all contrary to what stands for the Indian Republic.
It contradicts the ethos and the values ​​that we value as a nation.
“When CJI shows That some petitions that raised hatred speech problems were waiting before SC and suggested consolidated hearing about all petitions, both Sibal and Senior Indira advocates, appearing for Tushar Gandhi, which was opposed to this call was about calling for the destruction of the Muslim community which presented a unique problem that was threatening will tear the country’s secular cloth.
Bench recorded a problem to hear after 10 days.
Open calls for Muslim genocide made in these speeches to achieve ethnic cleaning, the applicant was suspected, adding to the “speech not only speech hatred but the number of open calls for the murder of the entire community.
This has a big threat.
For the unity and integrity of our country but also harm Millions of Muslim citizens’ lives Among ordinary Hindus.
The discourse argues that Indian and Hindu Muslims have competitive interests, and for the latter to prosper and achieve cultural self-awareness, the nature of the Republic of India must be changed with Hindu countries.
In its moderate form, the discourse advocates Social and economic boycycles Active Muslims, and in some cases physical extermination.
“Uttarakhand police on January 3 have submitted a quarter below Prabodhanand Giri, Dharamdas Maharaj, Maharaj Premanand, the Petitioner said, but complained that there was no arrest that had been made so far.