Raj Kundra has been involved in controversy since he was arrested by the Mumbai Crime branch for his involvement in the production and distribution of pornographic content.
Ripu Sudan Balkrishna Kundra aka Raj Kundra, sells the application ‘HotShots’ to a company based in Kenrin Pvt Ltd which is owned by his brother-in-law pradeep Bakshi.
But it was reported that 45-year-old entrepreneurs supply content and control British companies from the Vian Industrial Office.
Read Alsoraj Kundra Pornography Case: Employees who change witnesses are also asked to remove obscene clips from hotshots
Vulgar content but cannot be classified as porn: lawyer Raj Kundra during a fight in court, lawyer Raj Kundra has stated that it will be wrong to classify content as pornography.
He also objected to the application of the Part 67A from the Information Technology Act when sending obscene content in electronic forms along with other parts regarding pornography because this law considers “sexual relations” as a vulgar porn of content and it cannot be classified as porn.
Raj Kundra has been ordered below where? Entrepreneurs, who are married to Bollywood actress shilpa shetty, have been ordered under 420 sections (cheating), 34 (general intentions), 292, and 293 (related to ads and indecent displays) from the Indian criminal code (IPC) other than the part Relevant from IT laws and indecent representations of female laws (ban).
Read Alsoraj Kundra anticipate the arrest in the case of pornography; Lama Phone ‘Discard’ – Report
What are the Part 67A from the Information Technology Act? Toi spoke to a senior Vikas Pahwa advocate and he observed that the law ‘acting’ and ‘behavior’ were an important part of this section and that there must be sexual acts.
He further stated, “It cannot be a picture or statue, there must be actions involved or behavior.
So to sue someone under this action, they must show sexual relations between two individuals.
Behavior can be from individuals also amounts to actions under the section 67A.
So the lawyer here might be true because the ‘action’ must be involved.
”
Read Alsoraj Kundra Pornography Case: Bombay High Court to hear Plea Raj Kundrra challenge police prisoners and seek guarantees
What is the difference between pornography and erotica according to Indian law? In his statement to the police, Shilpa Shetty had mentioned that ‘Erotica’ was different from ‘porn’, where her husband had been accused, and that he was not involved in producing pornographic content.
Detailing the difference between the two, Vikas Pahas said, “The law is very silent because of that but the general difference is that erotica is mainly an artistic view point of an individual, such as a kind of picture of painting or statue.
The purpose of erotica appreciates art but when we talk about pornography, the aim is passion Directly.
So you circulate the content to satisfy someone’s passion.
If a film that fully has sexually explicit actions, of course it will be a violation under Section 67a.
”
What is the quantum of punishment under section 67a? Quantum penalties are 5 years under section 67a and even after confidence if the action is repeated then it is 7 years.