Thiruvananthapuram: The lack of consensus among allies regarding the main decision to spill in the open during the board meeting held on Tuesday, posing a fresh problem for the Mayor of Arya Rajendran.
Three heads of the committee stand – S Salim, D Anil and Jameela Sredharan – must face questions as long as the board forces some corrections in the agenda.
Strangely it came from Pallayam Rajan, one of the members of the senior party of the ruling party.
Chairman of the Salim Welfare Committee, who has been busy with complaints from opposing board members regarding the disbursement of welfare pensions, being arrested unconsciously when Pallayam Rajan raised a serious file delay problem.
Salim almost began to maintain corporate staff when Rajan explained in detail about several files that had been delayed for two to three years.
The Chairperson of the Welfare Committee finally escapes with the answer that this problem has come for their notification and will be resolved soon.
When everyone thought the trials ended, Rajan then chose Jameela Sredharan with the agenda of the heavy bridge for dry waste transportation.
Immediately after Jameela Sredharan was baked by BJP by quoting a lack of clarity in the agenda, Rajan piled up his tribulation and said someone would not conclude the problem of regulating a heavy bridge just by saying that the secretary was entrusted to look into it.
“This is not a good practice.
There must be a clear explanation of where and how heavy the bridge will operate,” he did not raise his words.
Jameela Sredharan, which was shaken with a sudden attack, came up with a reply that the corporation did not intend to install a heavy bridge, but would find some private parties who had already run it.
Works Standing Committee Chairman D Anil, who is also the leader of the Parliament Party, is also not spared.
When he presented the agenda to rearrange what he read as a committee to monitor electrical work, Rajan stepped until it corrected it.
“This is not the committee, as shown on the agenda is a panel,” he said.
Further Rajan described the lack of panels.
“These panel members charge their remuneration at 2% of the actual work estimation.
So the more estimated, the more money they produce.
This can lead to exorbitant estimates,” he showed a reconstituting error panel.
Rajan also advises panel members taken based on daily wages and this problem can be forwarded to the state government along with other agendas regarding the creation of new posts.
The source on the Board said the expression open differences did not reflect well on LDF.
“It clearly shows a lack of understanding and belief.
The Meeting of the Parliamentary Party is usually held to win the trust of each member of the Senior Council before presenting important decisions.
Differences are being expressed openly on the board because such discussions may not happen again,” said a source .
Difference opinion in LDF comes out in an open agenda
