‘Dirty messages for women are to get married instead of insults’

Mumbai: Observing that sending “obscene message” to a woman who will get married cannot be called insulting its politeness, a session court freed a man aged 36 years, 11 years after he was ordered to cheat and rap him under his false promise of marriage.
The court argues that sending such messages in a premarital period can be fun and gives a feeling that someone is close enough to understand someone’s emotions.
“If at all, it is not liked by other parties, he has wisdom with it to express his displeasure to the other, and other parties generally avoid repeating such errors.
The aim is to install his hopes before him, to raise him with the same sex feelings, That might provide happiness even to him, etc.
But in that way the SMS can be said as sent to insult his modesty, “the court was said.
The woman submitted FIR in 2010.
The couple had met on the Matrimonial site in 2007 and tried to get married even though there was an opposition.
The defendant’s mother opposed the match and refused to let her stay in one of the houses after the proposed marriage.
In 2010, the man broke the relationship.
Make a man from the accusation of rape, the court said every violation of promises to get married could not be called cheating or rape.
The court said the defendant was in a relationship for more than two years, initially took a rental house and then renovated his family’s flat.
“He even went to Arya Samaj Hall with Mangalsutra but a fight on the ground stayed after marriage and afterwards, bored with his doubts and surrendered before his mother’s desire and failed to handle and overcome the problem standing in front of him in the right way, he returned.
But of course not The case of fake marriage promises.
is a case of failure to make substantial efforts, “said the court.
It is said that there is no need for women to let accusations have sex with him before marriage.
The court said he chose it, believed blindly that they would get married, even though he was aware of the opposition.
“Even after respecting the emotions of informants (women), respecting his struggle for justice for 11 years or more, this court is a humble opinion that this is not a case that will show that violations of rape have committed,” The court is said.
Defendant’s parents were also ordered in this case.