Patna: The Division of Patna’s High Court Division consisting of Chief Justice Sanjay Karol and Justice S Kumar, hearing the problem of allotment of the gas station on Tuesday, making oral observations made discrimination between sons and daughters in the heritage of the father or ancestral property will not only be illegal, But it’s not constitutional too.
While hearing the writing petition submitted by one Kanchan Priya, the division bench was surprised to learn that the applicant’s application for allotment of the gas station in Muzaffarpur was rejected only because the land requested for the allotment was the property of the father and the applicant was a woman who could not prove its share on the land.
Referring to the provisions amended by Hindu succession laws that give the same rights regarding the CArTICenary (Heirship Joint) to Hindu women as the law of giving the same rights to men, the division bench says every discrimination in this case will be “not constitutional “.
The court also referred to the assessment of the Supreme Court Landmark in the case of Vineeta Sharma and Rakesh Sharma, where the peak court has decided that the daughter in the Hindu family has their equal paternal rights.
Delaying this problem for Wednesday, the court asked the oil company to respond to the observation of the court and answered why his actions rejected a woman’s request on the allotment of gas stations in the desire of legitimate share evidence in his father’s property was not treated discriminatory.
Both slapped by the Applicant: The Patna High Court on Tuesday slapped the costs of 10,000 Rs to the applicant to submit a “reckless” petition in Garb litigation of public interest (pill) against his uncle and aunt.
The pill was submitted to start investigations and the Cemara Inn on the alleged public fund deflectation conducted during the construction of toilets under the Mission of Swaby Bharat in Arwal Village in Arwal District.
The applicant has accused the bribery of RS 12,000 in the construction of each toilet taken on the example of his own aunt, which is Mukhiya from Panchayat, and her husband.
The High Court doubts “Bonda Fide” from the Petitioner and observed that the pill was submitted with his personal interest.
Discrimination between Son & Princess who is not constitutional: HC
