Donald Trump demanded social media firms with ‘small legal substances’

Washington: Frustrated on the ban on social media, former US President Donald Trump has sued Google Twitter, Facebook and Google owned Google, said they violated his first amendment rights by limiting him from their respective platforms.
However, the media report said on Thursday that the lawsuits were all healthy and angry with “small legal to support them”.
Trump has filed a demand for class law proposed against the company and Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Twitter Jack Dorsey and Google CEO and Alphabet Sundar Pichai.
Law demands come six months after Trump is permanently or while suspended from three platforms.
At a press conference on Wednesday, Trump refers to cases as “Game-Changers that are very important for our country.” Trump’s demands have also asked the court to declare part 230 of the “non-constitutional” political courtesy law.
The social media platform is protected by section 230 of the modesty of communication in the US.
The setting accused that Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube violated Trump’s first amendment rights.
“But the first amendment was intended to protect residents from the sensor by the government – not the private industry.
The irony that Trump itself is the top numbers in the federal government at that time may not be lost on the lap of anyone landing inside,” TechCrunch report.
Law demands claim that technology companies collude with “Democratic Parliamentarians,” Disease Control and Prevention Center (CDC) and Dr.
Anthony Fauci, Director of the National Allergy Institute and the Director’s infectious disease.
In a press conference, Trump quoted e-mail utas between Zuckerberg and Fauci from March 2020, which during the Trump Presidency itself, reported the threshold.
“We are not looking for a settlement.
We do not expect a solution,” Trump said in response to the question.
Trump opened a battle with a social media company long before he was banned from them in January after the Capitol Hill attack.
As president, he signed the executive order requested a federal agent to reduce the protection of section of the 230, but the order was revoked by President Joe Biden a year later.