Guwahati: The Judicial Department of Assam has said that there is no need for members of the Foreign Court (FT) to pass “direction / order of consequences” while giving opinions after finding that members give opinions in “random selected samples” when performing the assessment exercise performance.
The view of the Judicial department was then sent to FT members by the home department of the State for Compliance.
FTS, which is quasi-judicial, decides the fate of people suspected of illegal immigrants.
Orders strangers, 1964, empower fts to just open whether someone is a stranger or an Indian citizen.
Assam Deputy Secretary of the Political Department of Parijat Bhuyan on September 4 in Communication – with the subject of “consequential orders” – asking FT members to comply with the views of the justice department when passing through opinions.
“In the performance appraisal exercises carried out by the State Justice Department based on a random selected opinion sample provided by foreign trial members, the justice department has taken seriously through direction / order by members when giving opinions,” Deputy Secretary said.
Bhuyan said that “noted that consequential orders for the removal of the names of voter lists, arrests and detention of strangers stated, passed.
This might not be necessary”.
The Judicial department also stated that “notes that consequential commands for deportation, etc.
from foreigners stated, passing.
This may not be the right approach.” “The strangers, the court was empowered to make opinions only in terms of people whose cases were referred to.
After that, it’s up to the government to take the necessary actions.
But the FTS is used to forward orders for arrest, detention, deletion of the name of the voter list, cancellation of a ration card etc.
The order is passed beyond jurisdiction and illegal, “said a Gautati HC advocate to Ti.