New Delhi: Get rid of the center of the “States’ Center” stand, the Supreme Court on Monday asked the union government to decline the Buyer Builder and National agent agreement to protect the remaining household buyers in the Mercy of Real Estate Company and gets beautified by them.
Coupling Pils is looking for directions to the center to frame the agreement model with the provisions of Section 41 and 42 of the Real Estate Law (Regulation and Development), 2016, where the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Rera) was established.
In his written statement, the center said it did not have a role to be played in this regard and that under action, it was the responsibility of the state to frame the agreement model.
Judge Dy Chandrachud and Surya Kant persuaded the center not to adopt a direct approach and engage in the preparation of the model agreement to protect the non-suspiciously ‘middle class’ home buyers who often get full of money obtained with difficulty because of the builder because of the builder.
-Cecati sales agreements that tilt a lot towards the seller agent.
“Instead of leaving it to countries, the center can frame the national model law.
Builders often prepare a large sales agreement document with clauses that help them flat buyers.
We are worried about the fate of the middle class who gets it caught on the web from the sales agreement -Coons like that, “Bench said.
Lawyer General Tushar Mehta agreed to personally see the problem and respond in two weeks.
Bench said, “Buyer buyers and model buyers must have a particular clause (to protect middle-class flat buyers from getting an emergency) that cannot be negotiated even if countries want to tweak the model agreement in accordance with the situation that applies in countries Each.
“Judge Chandrachud remembered the assessment written by him related to Bengal Barat Rera.