Lucknow: The central assistance for the country rose sharply from more than Rs 1.36 lakh crore between 2012-13 and 2016-17 (the term of office of the Jamajwadi Party regime before) to more than Rs 2.01 lakh Crore during the BJP government government continued above, data issued by the state government on Saturday shows.
Data, which came a day before the completion of four and a half years Yogi Aditentalath, categorically noted that the Government of the UPA Congress at the Center released Rs 17,337.78 Crore in 2012-13 and Rs 22,405.16 Crore in 2013-14.
This increased to RS 32,691.47 Crore in 2014-15, RS 31,861.33 Crore in 2015-16 and Rs 32,536.86 Crore in 2016-17 after the Government Narendra Modi was in power.
A BJP spokesman said that the allocation showed that there was no discrimination carried out by the center with the previous SP government above.
“The increase in central allocations to the state is also a strong pointer for the influence of the government of ‘multiple machines’ from BJP, both at the center and country.
This ensures effective implementation of various central development schemes,” said the spokesman.
After BJP forms a government with an extraordinary majority, the center increases allocation – RS 40,648.44 Crore in 2017-18, RS 42,988.48 Crore in 2018-19, RS 44,043.96 Crore, Rs 57,487.59 Crore in 2020-21 and More than RS 16,415.61 Crore on 2021-22 to August 31, 2021.
Spokesperson said that progress rose mostly due to the joint efforts of the government in the center and country.
“Time and again, PM Modi has talked about the benefits of the government of ‘multiple machines’,” he added.
“Uttar Pradesh reached the top position in an effective implementation of around 90% of the central scheme which includes PM Watch out Yojana, PM programs the generation of employment, scheme of Ujjwala, Saubhagya scheme, development of personal toilets, smart work and the highest work in the MSME unit,” a spokesman said That, maintaining that this is in contrast to the previous SP government who tried to block the development and reject the implementation of several central welfare schemes.
“It denied people in the benefit of the welfare scheme,” said the spokesman.