Mumbai: The Enforcement Directorate (ED) on Monday submitted Affidavit to challenge the maintenance of the petition submitted by Aarti Deshmukh, 68, the wife of former Minister of Maharashtra Anil Deshmukh against attachments while their family assets worth RS 4.2 Crore at Money Laundering Kasing.
Deshmukh’s wife challenged the delayed process to confirm the attachment before the agency that taught under the prevention of money laundering Law (PMLA).
He also challenges the constitutional validity of certain provisions of these actions.
Ed in his written statement submitted by his assistant director in Mumbai raised the initial objection to the maintenance of his request because he had an alternative forum to approach first, and deny all the other charges of “false and unfounded”.
Ed said that the order of attachments was temporarily dated July 16, 2021, and the original complaint was submitted last year.
“Complaints have been heard by the authority to pronounce Hon’ble who will consider whether to confirm the attachment or not,” he said after that the two sides submitted their reply, this problem was provided for the order.
“Assuming that the attachment was confirmed, a firm drug before the Appellate court, PMLA was also provided in the law.
Therefore, here is not any basis, for the applicant allowed to avoid two legal forums and directly approach HC under his extraordinary jurisdiction , ” said the ed.
Agency quotes an assessment to argue that the process cannot be cut to “hurry” to HC directly by prematurely and thus seeking dismissal of its application and separate petition submitted by Port Premier Link PVT Ltd through Salil Deshmukh.
His advisor Vikram Chaudhri was looking for time to file an ester and the problem was postponed by Judge Gautam Patel and Madhav Jamdar until January 19.
Last month HC has been on December 6, 2021, stuck until January 14, Adjudicatory authority from passing each order to confirm temporary attachment Anil Deshmukh’s family assets.
The process can occur even though HC say.
He also challenged as a non-constitutional provision for Section 5 PML on the reasons offered “unreleased and arbitrary forces for authority” in terms of attaching any property without reports sent to the judge.
On December 10, 2021 HC has asked Ed and directing that “If the final order is passed between now and January 10, 2022, the order and further steps taken will be subject to the court order.”