Mumbai: Against the Anticipatory Guarantee Plea of Former Interior Minister Anil Deshmukh’s Son Hrishikesh at the Special PMLA Court, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) handed over that the latter was active participant in washing evil results.
In his reply on Monday, Ed said with the help of a Shell company based in Delhi, Hrishikesh (34) helping his father washed money polluted and projected it as no stained by showing it as a donation received by Shri Sai Shikshan Sanshtha owned by the family.
.
It was said in February and March this year this number is Rs.1.7 Crore.
He said before, the same modus operandi was adopted by the Deshmukh family and a total of 4.18 crore rs were transferred in trust in the Garb Donation since 2013.
The argument about the application will be heard at 4.
Ed said as many as six calls issued to Hrishikesh but he failed to appear.
“Since 2013, the applicant has involved himself in arranging the Hawala entries from the Shell company.
This fact is also strengthened by CA (Chartered Accountant), namely Sudhir Behati,” Ed said.
Meanwhile, Ed said accused of releasing the Cop Sachin Waze stated that he raised money on behalf of and over the instruction of Anil Deshmukh.
“The statement or deposition of someone with a bad reputation does not end the receipt of the statement.
Furthermore, the fact …
was also strengthened by two police officials in their statement,” said Ed Reply.
Alleged Ed Hrishikesh played a role in appointing various Dummy directors without their knowledge through the defendant Cas Vishal Khatwani and Vinod Hassani.
Ed also accused Hrishikesh to buy three companies at a price that was undervalued.
“Thus, the purchase of these companies seems to be a vehicle for conversion to cash to check through the benefits of this benami and in all these activities carried out by the Applicant (Hrishikesh),” Ed said in the answer submitted through a special prosecutor Shirsat.
and Arvind Aghav.
Looking for pre-capture guarantees through Inderpal B Singh and Aniket Nikam Advocates, Plea Hrishikesh said the transaction quoted by ED, including assets created by Anil Deshmukh, related to about 15 years ago when he was a teenager.
It was said that the Predicate violation, the CBI case, was related to alleged misuse of position by Deshmukh as Minister of Internal Affairs but the Probe ED reached several years before the term of office.
Ed believes that money laundering starts on the day property submitted as not stained.
“The fact that the applicant has full knowledge that the alleged transaction is from ‘crime’, still he continues to be the beneficiaries of postpartum maturity clearly determine his obligations retrospectively,” he said.
Ed opposed the Anil Deshmukh pre-capture pre-capture well
