New Delhi: Anil Ghanwat, one member of the SC designated committee, on Tuesday wrote to the Head of Indian Justice, urged him to consider releasing reports submitted by the panel in March, or validate the committee or for him to do it.
In his letter to CJI NV Ramana, said Ghanwat, “after the government’s decision to revoke the agricultural law in the upcoming winter parliamentary session, the committee report was no longer relevant in connection with the law but there were suggestions in farmers’ reports interesting to the public.
“This report can also play the role of education and facilitate it wrong with many farmers who have it, in my opinion, misguided by some leaders who do not seem to appreciate how the free market regulated minimally can allocate their most national resources productive.
“Ghanwat, senior leader of Shetkari Sanghatana and the President of the Swatantra Bharat Party, emphasized the need for reform, by saying that specific laws may not exist anymore,” impulse reform reflected in this law was not diluted “.
In his letter to CJI, Ghanwat said, “I want to bring to court notice that for decades of Indian farmers, as entrepreneurs in their own rights, have suffered regulations that strangling their production and marketing efforts.
Most of these regulations are protected in schedule 9 constitutions: far from justice supervision.
Regulations are intended to reduce damage caused by employers’ actions, but in cases of farmers, regulations have become causes of damage to farmers and to the environment.
Many Indian farmers who are desperate to be updated, no less, focus on reform – especially market freedom and technology freedom.
“This law is accepted in principle by our farmer’s movement, but it is not fully accepted by farmers because the Indian government policy process is not consultative.
I asked the Supreme Court of Hon’ble to consider directing the government to develop and apply the exemplary and strong policy process Followed in developed countries.
It will ensure that this kind of failure is not repeated and that valuable time from the court is not wasted in government and unproductive efforts that also end up causing anxiety and frustration in the community.
For example, by revocation of this law , a large number or farmer is now even more frustrated with the lack of attention to their needs.
“It looks important to establish a committee to suggest” a strong policy process to make a new agriculture law “, Ghanwat said the committee could prepare white paper and benefit from i option, consult broadly and recommend.
“Legislation produced from such a process will be accepted by Indian farmers who have long suffered,” Ghanwat said.
Ghanwat, senior leader of the agricultural group based on Maharashtra Shetkari Sanghatana, then when talking to a press conference said there were many farmers across the country who truly wanted reforms in the agricultural sector.
“We will be in the coming months to bring Delhi almost one lakh farmer to support agricultural reform,” he said.
SC has been on January 12, is a committee to listen to farmers’ complaints related to agricultural law and government views, and to make recommendations.
The panel has been on March 19 submitting its report to the APEX court.
The report, so far, is not published.