New Delhi: Appellate Electricity Tribunal’s Technical Members and former Gail CMD Ashutosh Karnatak on Tuesday received a lesson with the Propesif from the Supreme Court after validating the objection of Sravanthi’s energy separation to him being part of the public sector business bench.
.
Appearing to Sravanthi, Senior Advocate Singhvi told the Chairman of the NV Judge Ramana and Judge as one of the 10 cases involving Gail as a party that had been decided by carnatak about violations of unavoidable tombs.
The bench did not lose time in agreed with Singhvi and asked, “How did he (Karnatak) heard this problem? This is a question of courtesy.
He has worked with Gail for more than three decades.
This is a simple case of violations of interest.” Finding additional lawyers Sanjay Jain appeared for PSU, Bench said, “You are a government.
If there are vacancies in members and Post Chair, you appoint them.
After being appointed, such cases must be heard by people who do not have past relationships with parties Litigation Party.
“Cji-led bench has taken a serious view of the central lethargy in filling in a post in court and told the government to represent them if they could not appoint their members, technical members and chairmen, making it non-functional.
CJI has regretted that despite the election panel, each led by Judge SC, recommending many names, the government was sitting on them.
The promise of meeting for the court has taken speed after the Bench LED CJI explosion last month.
Finding the same job vacancy that interferes the work of Aptel, Cji on Tuesday says the head-headed panel SC has recommended the name for the appointment of the chairman and member to an electric appeal court, but it seems that promises have not been made.
The bench incurred was notified to the center and prosecutor General K K venugopal and asked, “Tell us when promises made”.
In September, there was a deadlock between SC and the center as he reaffirmed the right to reject the name recommended by the Judge SC LED panel to appoint the court.
But the bench consisting of Cji Ramana and Judge D Y Chandrachud and L N Rao said that in a democratic country regulated by the law supremacy under the constitution, the government could not say it would not accept this recommendation.
Former Gail Cmd in court bench in the PSU case received SC lessons in propriety
