Bengaluru: Special Court for Representatives was selected on Saturday directing the Lokayukta police to conduct a fresh investigation in connection with the complaints of land denotification submitted against the BS Yediyurappa chairman of 2013.
The complaint was submitted by Vasudeva Reddy, a resident of Bengaluru.
He claimed that the pieces of certain soil obtained for the IT corridor between Whitefield and Electronics City denied the illegal benefit under government notifications on June 21, 2006 by Yediyurappa (charged as accused of no.
2) when he was the Deputy Minister of Chief and they were allocated to Entrepreneurs.
Investigation officer submitted a ‘B’ final report stating that there was no violation that seemed to have been done by the Defendant No.
2 Under Section 13 (1) (d) Read with Section 13 (2) Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
The court is looking for a final report from Distah, a special judge Shridhar Gopalakrishna Bhat noted that the final report delivered by the Investigation Officer did not instil Trust in court and directed the Deputy SP attached to the Lokayukta police to investigate this issue and submit the final final / final reports quickly according to the law and post this problem until August 21.
The investigation officer has also been told by the observation of the mind carried out by the High Court on December 22, 2020 ordered the delay in the investigation, when the petition submitted by the minister’s head came to be dismissed.
In 2019, Yediyurappa has moved the High Court to challenge the command of a special court directed the Lokayukta police to investigate this problem.
He was satisfied on October 9, 2015, HC has raised a process against RV Deshpande, which has been charged as accused of No.1 in this case and has been enforced by the Supreme Court as well.
However, the High Court rejected the request and showed that the allegations of them were ‘different and different’ and there was no relief given for help.
The High Court has further recorded a deliberate and intentional delay in the part of the Investigation Agency because it did not conclude an investigation from February 18, 2015 when the complaint was called an investigation until 2 April 2019, when the High Court actually remained probe., “Mandiri and impartial body What is entrusted with the task to investigate the violation of the public servants objectively, (Lokayukta police) cannot cause an impression in the mind of the general public that it plays into the hands of Bigwig Politics, “The High Court has observed when issuing directions to special courts to monitor investigations in the case – like that.