Panaji: Bill Goa Bhumiputra Adhikarini was introduced and authorized at the Cave Assembly who ignored the red flag that was raised by the income Minister Jennifer Monserrate and Burokrates, RTI Documents revealed.
The various questions raised by citizens after the bill was passed by all entered into files on July 29 and 30 by the Minister of Revenue, Revenue Secretary of Sanjay Kumar, Finance and Law Department.
“The bill has not been approved by administratively by the Minister of Revenue.
The bill has not been thoroughly examined and may have an unexpected extensive consequence,” Sanjay Kumar’s income secretary said in his note.
He also suggested that the bill published “to get public comments”.
RTI documents show that in the record on July 29, Monserrate has warned that the proposed law is wrong in many things and will endanger the interests of private owners, government departments, comunidades, devasthans and the environmental sensitive zone.
The income department also warned the state government that the bill’s bill allowed “strong” land transfer “which would violate the 3100A constitutional article.
Monserrate also warns that in accordance with its provisions, government employees living in government housing can claim the right to their place.” There are many Other implications of the bill that need to be examined by having detailed discussions about each provision …
after examining the points above, the same thing can be introduced in the next assembly session, “Monserrate said in the official note.
RTI documents obtained by Congress’ RTI Cell Chairman Dominic Noronha proves that despite Revenue Minister Kumar clearly wrote on July 30 at around 2 in the morning that the bill had not been administratively approved by the Minister of Revenue and needed to be tested concern and introduced fears Bill at home at 4 am.
Revenue department, law and Finance raises pe Rtanyan on the Bill provisions and call for more details to be obtained before being introduced in the state legislature.
Sawant rejected bad comments.
“This proposal is not recommended in the present form, and requires more detail because the land is a valuable source.
Next, the introduction of the bill was not recommended,” said Finance Recrecretary Pranab Bhat.
“Acredeness and comments clearly exposes the hidden motives of the BJP government in misleading the general public who will fall in love with political gimick like that, because it is well known before that the bill cannot stand the legal supervision test as well that it will need a presidential accident,” said a spokesman Congress Aashish Kamat.
Congress said that Sawant not only ignored the request from the opposition to hold a detailed discussion on the bill, but also ruled out a similar demand from the IAS officer and his cabinet colleagues.
Using official documents, Congress said that Sawant received a bill approved by the cabinet on July 27, a day before the state legislative assembly session began.