New Delhi: With the Supreme Court rejected the OBC quota in the election of the Local Agency of Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh and the same fate may in other countries have or seek similar provisions, this center worked on a plan to improve the APEX situation by challenging the verdict.
Even though the plan is at a newborn stage, this center is considering objections to the verdict on certain reasons while questioning “Krishna Murthy Judgment” for 2010, which put “triple test” – the root of the OBC quota in Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh was beaten.
It seems that legal reviews by a larger bench can be searched.
However, experts believe that the legal review may not completely cancel the situation caused by the decision as “Krishna Murthy Judgment” seems to speak of a separate OBC list for political quota because it oppose the list of social and economic limitations for ordering in work institutions and government education.
If the government must attack the core of the provocation and find a permanent settlement, the constitutional amendments to the relevant part handled by the “Court Krishna Murthy” may also be a possible route to improve the situation.
For example, according to an expert, the government can identify OBC for political quota in Article 243D and 243T because the list of OBC countries is used for job quota and education.
This might negate the need to determine exclusively for political quotas.
Urgency seems to come from the realization that because no state has determined the initial OBCS through commission arrangements, the legal challenges in the court can scratch the quota to retreat in all other states.
“Krishna Murthy Judgment” is very consequential because the rules of economic and social retardation do not need to mean political backwardness, with many who read it to request a separate OBC list for different political backwards from the list familiar with the state-wise.
Job Quota and Education.
However, it must be seen how the situation evolved remembered that the problem was complicated after the Supreme Court in detail put the reason for the rejection to accept the OBC quota in the local body selection in the absence of a “triple test”, which included the countries “, which included changing the quantum OBC quota to ensure That SC / ST / OBC reservation does not exceed 50%, and arrange commissions to collect contemporary data on OBC and their political backwardness.