Mumbai: Guaranteed to Rahila Furniturewala for nine months after his arrest at the Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) case of medicines connected with the death of Sushant Singh Rajput actor, this week’s special NDPS court held no material in advance.
Engagement in financing, illegal trade and hiding offenders.
The court also showed that there was no sign of confiscated from him.
“Investigation ends and Chargesheet has been submitted.
In such circumstances, nothing can be achieved by keeping charges behind bars for an unlimited period.
The majority of other defendants, have more serious charges, has been released on a guarantee.
In such circumstances, The defendant is also entitled to be released on a guarantee on the basis of parity, “said Special Judge DB Mane.
Residents of Bandra Rahila were accused of buying a gram of MDMA (commonly known as ecstasy) from allegedly prisoners Anuj Keshwani for his friend in January 2020, which he allegedly paid him Rs 6,000.
The prosecution accused that during the investigation, Keshwani revealed Rahila’s name.
FIR in this case was registered last year.
Rahila was arrested in the case on February 4 this year.
He was also ordered in a separate drug case involving the Cabinet Minister Maharashtra Nawab Malik’s daughter-in-law, Sameer Khan.
Rahila has been given guarantees in other cases too.
In the case of rajput related, arguing for a bail, his advocate Taraq Sayyad said he was wrongly involved.
The next defense was conveyed that there was no contrabanded goods confiscated or restored in the example and there was no evidence that connected it to Keshwani and the alleged agreement.
It was also submitted that his statement was unacceptable as proof.
The prosecution is very opposed to plea guarantees.
Allegedly that he also approached Keshwani offered marijuana and CBD at 1,800 per gram rates on behalf of accused.
Prosecution said this shows that he conspires to finance prohibited traffic and coach of the port, procurement, own, sales and purchase, transportation, imports between states, export between countries and engage in dealing with marijuana.
The court said there was no special allegations about Rahila who hid anyone.
“There is no ingredient at all revealing the Prima Facie involvement present accused of illegal trade financing and hiding offenders.
In such circumstances, section 37 of the NDPS law does not apply to accused now,” the court said.
Under section 37, no one is accused of under section 27a for trade and perpetrators or violations involving commercial counts can be guaranteed unless the court is satisfied there is reasonable reasons to believe that the person is innocent.
– Rebecca Samervel.