Ahmedabad: The Gujarat High Court on Friday questioned the collector of the Gir Somnath district whether his government handled women and children in his jurisdiction in the same way claimed to take care of cow descendants.
Judge Paresh Upadhyay has been looking for a reply to this question on August 13.
He asked this during the petition hearing submitted by one Aspak Panja, which was booked twice under the actions of animal atrocities (prevention).
On the basis of two firs, district collectors call the prevention of anti-social activity laws (PASA) by calling them ‘cruel people’.
Panja has challenged paga orders.
The judge asked, “Do we care for enough women and children in the area, the way claims are made to take care of cow descent (Gaugansh).
Of course, beef may not be made suffering, but do we care for children and women enough?” June 29, HC suspended the command of Pasa to Panja and ordered for direct release from prison.
The court observed, “the opportunity is given to the authority of the detention to submit a reply between Alia which mentions in it, whether the claimed treatment has been taken in the name of the country for Gaugansh in this case, similar treatments are being taken for the citizens of the area under its jurisdiction.” The court also recorded In the order that the district collector reply will be considered when recording the last sequence.
On Friday, the judge asked the prosecutor to make officers reply to special requests raised by the court.
In the previous order, HC was recorded, “said two APIs and other material which on the record is considered by this court.
On the consideration of the materials and arguments of the contest parties, Prima Facie, the order of impunned is not sustainable.”