Ahmedabad: After receiving a complaint about the anti-land law that was recently applied and seeing the busy petition in the Gujarat High Court which challenged various provisions, the state government tended to come out with regulations to improve Lacunae in the law.
On Thursday, during the trial in a group of Gujarat land seizure questions (ban) Act 2020, Advocate General Kamal Trivedi made a statement, again we met in “New Year, we argue with a rule.
I am very clear and we try to see Whatever we can do, we will do it.
“General Advocates made a statement about the government’s plan to announce the regulation after the Chief Justice of Justice Aravind Kumar and Justice Ashutosh Shastri showed him recent amendments made by the Government of Karnataka in the income law The land, which with him made regularization provisions.
For tenacity ownership and forest occupants, they have been strongest in an invalid way.
The court attracted the government’s attention to this provision after a lawyer argued about the obstacles that the anti-land law created has created ownership of agricultural land for tribal people.
In this case, a belief has taken a plot of land on the lease of 99 years in 1966, and after the enactment of this law, the trust was nicknamed a land grabber.
The law has been questioned for various reasons, especially for disturbing disputes resolved by the main effects on delayed civil disputes and civil court decisions.
The lawyers ended the Draconian law and submitted how Gujarat had adopted several protection compared to other states.