Ahmedabad: The Gujarat High Court on Monday fell many in the state administration because it requested the provisions of the new anti-land law enacted for disputes regarding personal traits and to rarely ask encroachment in government land.
Judge Paresh Upadhyay heard four petitions who challenged the commandment of the Amreli District Judge who requested the prevention of anti-social activity laws (PASA) to people after they were ordered under Gujarat Land Return Law (Prohibition).
They were nicknamed as land inhibitors because they had a cottage on a plot of private land.
The judge said, “It’s all personal disputes.
Show me at least one case of encroachment in the government’s land.” Judge further commented, “There are so many cases of land deprivation including disputes between tenants and landlords.
Even forced Pasa was forced to expel the tenant.
Look at what happened to the Gauchar land (meadow).
The hotel is being built along the highway.
Show one case Land grabs government land.
“The court also said,” The district judge was very enthusiastic to enter private land disputes, whether it was permitted or not, but not in disputes over government land.
If they act against encroachment on government land, the purpose (from law) will do it served.
” Judges criticized the publicity recently by the government about the first number of shots listed under the anti-land law that reached for it.
In this case, the judge became angry when the reward submitted by the Government Authority tried to justify the Paga Prayer on the grounds that if a certain woman in Detenian Detenia was external, he could still get help from lawyers.
But to file a guarantee for his release, it would be a matter of time consuming for him.
The judge made a government advocate to read a written statement hard and asked why government officials should not be asked to show the reason why criminal insults to the court process should not be initiated against it for creating obstacles in the administration of justice.
HC has booked orders on all four petitions.
Guj: ‘Why isn’t there a case of land deprivation about government land?’
