New Delhi: Taking a big step towards openness and releasing the “transparency revolution”, the Indian justice system on Saturday for the first time starting a streaming of the court that functions with the Chairman of the NV Ramana launched live streaming from the Gujarat High Court process and ensure that the Supreme Court will start soon , The Supreme Court has 2018 stating that television broadcasts directly from important cases will lead greater transparency and three years after the order of a committee led by Judge D Y Chandrachud, the draft rules are resolved for living streaming and recording the court process.
Launching a system to live streaming from the process in Gujarat HC, Ramana justice said the justice system is always open as people are allowed to the court process of the witness but with streaming access to justice will be a true reality, when it is lawful and interested parties to witnesses, understand and Understand the justice of the first hand dispensation.
He said that live streaming will also erase some wrong ideas in the minds of the community regarding the delivery system of justice because they will be able to get first hand information and without being filtered by transmission agents who are vested interests are sometimes used for the dissemination of misinterpretations in order to embarrass or discredit institution.
“This is a lack of direct access that provides space for a misunderstanding.
Live streaming formalization of the court process is the best medicine for the disease above.
Livestreaming of the process is very important for the dissemination of information that is the holy aspect of chapter 19.
Through such direct access, people can Getting the first hand information about the entire process and opinions of the judges, leaving a little space for any mischief, “he said.
The CJI said that the judge may feel the pressure of public supervision because live streaming which can eventually lead to the stressful environment.
He, however, said, “The judge must remember, even if the command of justice stands against popular perceptions, he has to do it from his commitment to oath he takes under the constitution”.
“A judge cannot be affected by popular opinions.
Yes, with an increase in public gaze, he might be the subject of several debates, which should not prevent him from his duties to protect the right of one against the power.
Always remember, as a repository of faith, a judge no able to objectivity lose, “he said …” The committee under the leadership of Brother Chandrachud played a beautiful role in bringing all courts on the board to release the transparency revolution with the help of modern technology.
As I have stated before, while launching access to the online process of the Supreme Court to Media, we want to start a minimum life process for several courts at the Supreme Court.
We work out logistics and work on a full court consensus.
With the help of modern technology, I was told that we could introduce this feature Live streaming at an effective cost without imposing a lot of loads At K.
US country, “which CJI s helped.