Gujarat High Court Staying Load Deprivation – News2IN
Ahmedabad

Gujarat High Court Staying Load Deprivation

Gujarat High Court Staying Load Deprivation
Written by news2in

Ahmedabad: The Gujarat High Court on Tuesday remains a criminal process under the Gujarat land seizure law (ban) against the descendants of a Pakistani refugee, which was resolved by the government in Kutch Shivlakh Village in the 1970s.
Two men, Anilsinh and Jayendrasinh Jadeja, were booked in June by the Lakadiya Police Station because of their alleged encroachment on the government land and run the hotel in three fields of land along the highway.
Fir it was registered by the village sarpanch.
Court sessions in Bhuj have provided temporary protection against their arrest in response to their anticipatory guarantee applications.
The brothers moved HC through Utkarsh Advocates Dave and Shweta Lodha demanding FIR and also challenging the provisions of the anti-land law that reached, to accommodate and declare part 2 (d), 4, 9, 11, 15, 17 of the action With rules such as those who violate article 14, 20, 21 and 254 constitutions.
In their request, they argued that the main disputes involved land, given by the government to their big grandfather and his family after their arrival in India from Pakistan.
It is part of the refugee resettlement scheme.
The family has ownership of this land since 1979, when deputy collectors issued a sequence of allotment.
There had been a delayed civil dispute in connection with the land in the Bhachau Court.
The second dispute relates to the canteen run near the Gujarat Energy Transmission Corporation Ltd.
After the death of their uncle, Anilsinh has managed eating outlets.
They claimed that they had nothing to do with the plot that was debated third.
The applicant has argued that the provisions of the action were dramatically, arbitrary and unreasonable.
It was susceptible to abuse because there were no exceptions that had been carved in it.
The bench headed by the Chairperson of Judge Vikram Nath, the Proceeds of FIR remembering the previous order was forwarded in the petition that challenged the constitutional validity of the law.

About the author

news2in