Ahmedabad: In what ended up as a big paradox, a family court gave a divorce decision to a husband, while other courts on the same campus have allowed the wife’s request to restit the risk of conjugal rights to direct the matrimonial obligations.
The marriage dispute that received conflicting orders has now ended in the Gujarat High Court who confessed.
During the process on Monday, the Justice B B B Pardiwala and Justice V D Navisati questioned the reason for contradictory commands by the family court.
In return, it was conveyed that a husband’s lawsuit for divorce decree was happening in court number 2, where the wife could not stay present because he had received a court call.
At the same time, the Wife’s application submitted under Section 9 Hindu marriage laws for the restitution of conjugal rights is taking place in court number 3, where the husband does not exist.
Although the courtroom was side by side and both parties preached for several years, the court passed the Ex-Parte command in supporting Wangigants in 2018.
It was clearly difficult to execute conflicting orders at the same time.
The husband approached the High Court and challenged the command of the family court directed him to do his matrimonial task.
While the husband’s appeal was waiting, the wife also moved HC recently and challenged divitting divorce stating that it was passed without hearing it.
Husband’s advocacy argues that the wife has known about the divorce process, but she chose not to appear in the process and resume demand for conjugal rights restitution in other courts.
Wife’s advocacy, on the other hand, claimed that the woman did not have a hunch on divorce and call claims presented in the form of public notification, published in a newspaper.
The couple married in 2008 and had lived separately since 2013.
They have a 11-year-old girl, who lives with her father.
The woman also had complaints about child prisoners.
The High Court acknowledged the wife’s petition and decided to hear the appeal submitted by the two parties together.