Ghaziabad: Police Recommend Charging Yati Narsinghanand Saraswati, Priest Priest from Dasna Devi Temple recently received a senior position in Juna Akahara as ‘Mahamandaleshwar’, under the laws of Goonda and sent her archives to the Ghaziabad government to start.
A senior police officer said on Monday, the decision was taken because of the 10 cases registered against Yati at a different police station in the district, besides one in Delhi, and the surrounding controversy and the premise of the temple had often occurred.
As a result, the officer said, the police had to spread personnel near the temple all the time to defend the law and order.
In March this year, a 10-year-old boy from a minority community was destroyed by Yati’s aide to enter the temple compound, which was the entry of the entry of Muslims.
Earlier this month, another boy, also from a minority community, equated with a “trained killer” and was accused of entering the temple complex “for recce” by Yati.
The police have clarified that the purpose of the boy was a coexistent health center but he was confused and took the wrong gate.
In the report sent to Administration, the police have described Yati as “harmful to the community” and also refers to the use of “demeaning language” against women in politics.
On August 31, three fired to him at the Masuri police station for his comments in women – two of them in complaints by Sub-Inspector Logesh Kumar and Anil Kumar and the third after the National Commission on the Chair of the Women Rekhar Sharma wrote to DGP beat Sharma.
About two videos about Yati’s comments that have been distributed on the social media platform.
The first video appeared on August 7 and the other on August 29.
ASP Akash Patel told Tii, “Yati has also tried to disrupt peace regularly.
Yati accused (on October 11) a 10-year-old boy entered the temple to kill him, but the police investigation showed that the boy had entered mistaken because he wanted to leave Go to the government hospital to see his relatives.
We have also mentioned other cases in the report.
The file was sent to the administration five days ago and we are now waiting for permission from the district judge (to file a fee).
“A case under the Goondas Law was submitted after The process in which the administration conducts hearing where someone who faces charges can argue against them.
In Ghaziabad, additional district judges are likely to lead the process.
After the trial was over, the file went to DM for the final decision.
Someone who was slapped with the GOONDAS ACT case must leave the district for a period of time that cannot exceed six months.
First FIR in Ghaziabad against Yati was submitted in 2005 at the Kavi Nagar police component for allegedly threatening government employees.
The second was in 2010 at the Masuri police station on charges of reduction.
A man who was accused of stealing from the temple had died of suicide.
Other cases were submitted to Him in 2014 (Niwari PS), 2016 and 2017 (Kotwali PS), 2019 (Masuri PS, after Panchayat Meeting was called Yati to resolve a dispute of anger that changed violence) and earlier this year (at Masturi PS.) For allegedly making communal comments.
In April 2021, Delhi police submitted a case against him for allegedly hurting religious sentiments through his remarks made at the Indian press club.
FIR was put forward at the Street Parliament Police Station.
Said Imam Dasna Temple on Monday he will meet Ghaziabad DM to present his side.
“If the administration imposes the Goonda Law on me, I will do a hunger strike without limits outside the cm,” said Yati.
Police, after 2019 violence, tried to request GOONDA action against him.