Nagpur: A group of harmed marriages and page owners have moved the Nagpur bench from the Bombay High Court to pray for direction to the authorities to allow them to run their business activities similar to several other businesses.
They quote orders issued by the Department of Revenue and Forests, and the Department of Disaster Management, Rehabilitation and Rehabilitation in Mantralaya stated that Nagpur must be brought based on level-I conditions as a Covid-19 case witness a steep decline.
While issuing notifications for the final disposal of the petition at the stage of receipt, the division bench consisting of Judge Sunil Shukre and Anil Pansare on Friday direct respondents, including the head of the secretary, responded before February 16.
Commissioner Division, Collector and Nagpur Municipal Corporation (NMC) Commissioner is another respondent in the case filed through Shyam Dewani advice.
Depending on the cinema hall, theater, malls, restaurants, and other companies are allowed to continue their business with a capacity of 50%, the applicants, under the Aegis Association of Mangal Karmalaya and Lawn, said the classification of unreasonable government causes discrimination against them.
The petition shows that the space and wedding page are not permitted to carry out operations with the same 50% capacity for those who have taken both covid vaccine doses.
It stated that the petition was submitted prematurely, the government applicant Sanjay Doiphode and NMC Counsel Sudhir Puranik gave a court that collectors had continued proposals to the principal secretary of disaster management, the rehabilitation department on Thursday recommended several relaxation which previously imposed a Covid-19 pandemic account.
Make notifications issued by respondents as a violation of fundamental rights, the applicants said the command was discriminatory, arbitrary, artificial, dodging and imposed without the application of the mind.
Praying for direction to the respondent to allow business / activities in the district to be carried out in accordance with the provisions specified based on the State Order on June 4, 2021, the Petitioner argues there is no reason behind such a classification, which creates classes in class.
, and do not meet the valid understood test.