New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Wednesday directing Tripura Police not to take coercive actions against three members of civil society including a journalist in connection with the nesting FIR under the provisions of strong UPA for them for allegedly presenting social media posts about “targeted violence” against the community Minority in the state.
A bench consisting of the Chairman of the Justice of NV Ramana and Judges such as Bopanna and Hima Kohli also issued a notice to the police agartala about the application submitted by supporters, Mukesh and Ansarul Haq, and Shyam Meera Singh’s journalist against the first inn.
Members of the civil society, which are part of the Facting Discovery Committee, also challenges the constitutional validity of several provisions of ACT’s violation of activity (prevention) Act, 1967 on the grounds that the definition of “legal violating activities” is unclear and broad.
Of course.
In addition, the law gave a guarantee to accuse very difficult.
Recently, the northeastern state witnessed the incidence of combustion, looting and violence after the report emerged from Bangladesh that the Hindu minority there had been attacked during the ‘Durga Puja’ on allegations of alert.
Hardness of Tripura: SC directed Tripura police not to take the steps of coercion against 3 members of civil society
