Chandigarh: The Supreme Court has put that reservations in public work cannot cross 50% and the general category must get at least 50% of shares in posts advertised but in Haryana, the general category candidates hardly get the opportunity to manage 10%.
Share in the state government posts advertised.
The candidates who emerged for the work of Haryana’s government under the general category had been placed on severe losses because the reservation was notified by the state government for socio-economic criteria, where family candidates without anyone in government work, the past or present, will get five Extra signs and five other signs because their father does not live.
Recent recruitment checks at Police Haryana revealed that in the final election at 400 sub-inspectors, only 22 (about 5% of the total chosen) candidates from the general category did not use the socio-economic criteria.
Similarly, regarding the recruitment of sub-inspectors (women) where 65 posts are advertised and only three candidates (around 4% of the selected total) are selected without the benefits of socio-economic criteria.
For recruitment of female police, against 1,100 posts, even one candidate was chosen without the benefits of socio-economic criteria.
Chasing the criteria as a non-constitutional and arbitrary work to celebrate candidates, a petition was submitted in front of Punjab and Haryana High Court.
Taking awareness of the request, the division bench, which consisted of justice GS Sandhawalia and Justice Vikas Suri, issued a notice to the government Haryana who was looking for a country reply on March 28.
The problem reached the High Court behind the petition submitted by Deepak Dahiya and one candidate again, who had submitted the appointment as a sub-inspector at the police Haryana but could not be chosen even though it performed well in service because of the extra sign given for socio-economic criteria.
They searched for directions to cancel notifications on June 11, 2019 As far as the contributing candidate has not been chosen because of the benefits of the sign given to socio-economic criteria.
They also looked for directions to cancel the results for the 400 sub-inspector election stated on October 31, 2021.
Applicant, Deepak Dahiya was included in the general category and guaranteed 62.80 signs in the final achievement list for the recruitment of sub-inspectors and cutting-off signs for The final achievement list is 66.60.
According to the applicant, despite securing a high sign he cannot be chosen because he does not qualify for the socio-economic criteria of the country, and those who are much lower in services than he is chosen because of additional signs under socio-economic quota.
According to the applicant, only 22 candidates are chosen without the benefits of additional signs given based on socio-economic criteria.
“That is, the pure services of the elections have not been considered and most of all candidates fall in the category of socio-economic criteria have been chosen,” the Petitioner told HC.
Advice for the Petitioners, Rajender Singh Malik argues that this really violates article 14, 15, and 16 constitutions and applicants have been rejected by equality of opportunity in terms of community meeting appointments because the candidates covered under the socio-economic criteria finally get five or 10 Extra signs although lower in services against the applicants.
Referring to the SC verdict passed in cases, titled Indra Sawhney and M Nagaraj versus Union of India, Advocate Malik told HC that it had been held by the Supreme Court Constitutional bench that the state could not eliminate the constitutional requirements of the ceiling.
50% reservation in work.
It was held that if the 50% ceiling limit was violated, the structure of quality and equality in Article 16 of the Constitution would collapse, argued advisers.