Chennai: Madras High Court on Tuesday questioned the Tamil Nadu government for his decision to establish a committee to see the impact of the NEET in medical acceptance, asking whether it had obtained permission from the Supreme Court and whether the move would not violate the decision of the APEX court.
When Tamil Nadu Advokat-General R Shunmugasundam, responded to PIL against Justice Commission K Rajan, said it was a policy decision supported by the demand of the community and the promise of the election of the ruling party, the first bench said: “Maybe.
But if it contradicts the Supreme Court’s command, So it cannot be permitted.
“Rises consisting of the chairman of Judge Sanjib Banerjee and Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy then postponed the trial with July 5 with direction to submit his response.
It will also be open to the Government Government to show his attitude, add judges.
The pill was submitted by the Secretary of BJP Tamil Nadu K Nagarajan, who wants the court to cancel the order of June 10, is a committee led by Justice Rajan to study the impact of the neet in a social retarded student.
Advocate V Ragavachari, representing the applicant, proposed that the committee settings are in vain exercises because there are recommendations that might be carried out by such a committee cannot be carried out in the light of the view taken by the Supreme Court in NEET.
Quoting the Commandment of the Supreme Court in NEET on August 22, 2017, Raghvachari said the APEX court had noted in the assessment that ‘Tamil Nadu would not make any kind of difference or discrimination between the exam done by various councils; And acceptance must be done in accordance with the results of the NEET examination.
“Therefore, there may be a little room for the country to establish any committee for the purpose of ensuring whether the NEET-based acceptance process has influenced students who are socially underdeveloped,” The Tamil Nadu government should note that NEET was introduced in national interests, and all efforts To change the same thing it will thwart the object and the purpose of the introduction of the Neet, “the Petitioner said.