Prasagraj: The High Court of Allahabad has set aside the dismissal of a government employee who was dismissed from service in the field that he was in a direct relationship with another woman despite the fact that she was married and his wife was still alive.
Judge Pankaj Bhatia, passing the order on July 14, explained to the authority of the State to pass the new order which imposes small punishment.
The order of dismissal was forwarded to the applicant, Gore Lal Verma, solely on the ground which despite marrying one Laxmi Devi, who was still alive, the applicant maintained extra-marriage relations with other women named Hemlata Verma and both lived together as husband and wife.
He also has three children from a live-in Said relationship.
Passing through the sequence of dismissal which was revealed, the authorities had noted that the behavior was contrary to the provisions of the government’s behavioral behavior, 1956, and the provisions of the Hindu marriage law.
Thus, the sequence of dismissal from the service is passed.
It was debated on behalf of the applicant who was in a similar case in the case of one Aneeta Yadav, this court, after considering, set aside the order of dismissal.
However, the opportunity was given to respondents to give any small sentence, if they wanted it.
Furthermore, it argued that the assessment was challenged with special leave to appeal and the Supreme Court refused to interfere.
As a result, the special leave for appeal was dismissed.
After hearing the advice, the court ruled out his dismissal order observing that considering the facts and assessment of this court in the case of Aneeta Yadav, the applicant was also entitled to the same benefit.
As a result, the Writ Petition was allowed and the respondent’s authority was directed at returning the applicant.
However, the applicant will not be repaid wages from the date of dismissal until now, the court is directed.
“Open to the respondents to continue fresh orders to impose small punishment in accordance with the law, if so suggested,” added the court.