Mumbai: Bombay HC on Tuesday set aside the state government notices to hold a joint entry test for acceptance to Junior Higher Education, said the country “exceeded its strength” by imposing the condition of the non-state council students.
Hakeses Ramesh Dhanuka and Riyaz Chagla ruled at ICSE students Patki and the intervention of the request by four IGCSE students who challenged May 28 which said the acceptance to class XI would only be decided on the SSC syllabus board.
“In our view, such conditions are arbitrary, hard, changing and without legal authority,” said the judges.
The country is directed “to issue the appropriate order” cancel CET in 48 hours and “complete the process to enter based on a sign guaranteed in STD X with an internal evaluation / assessment within a maximum of 6 weeks”, HC added.
The judges say there is no provision in the Secondary Education Board of Maharashtra and Height, 1965 and in its rules for a CE.
With the help of issuing executive orders based on article 162 (the extent of state executive), the government cannot affect laws and rules related to the criteria for feasibility, they add.
Life is more important than JR College’s choice, HCsetting said in addition to the government notification to hold CET for FYJC receipts, Bombay HC on Tuesday said the state acted contrary to the provisions of Maharashtra Maharashtra, 1965 and its rules and “exceeded its strength by issuing government resolution Thus placing such an embargo or condition that will affect the rights of these students from other councils to get a junior entrance ticket affiliated with the State Council in accordance with them..
“Ramesh’s Justice Bench and Justice Riyaz Chagla help that by imposing a condition made by students Other councils in CET based on SSC Syllabus and the priority were given to those who emerged to Cep in the first stage of revenue, the state government “had seized students from other legal councils to compete with the State Council students.” The High Court said because of the GR, students “who were waiting to start their second innings by taking in in Junior College suffering from mental trauma, anxiety and tension.” They noted that even though the Gr was issued on May 28, the date of CET and Syllabus was recently announced.
They said the start of the academic year would be postponed if CET was allowed and it would “cause gross injustice” for all students including the State Council.
Some “10.98 lakh” has registered for optional CET which will be held on August 21.
The judges accepted the submission by his father, suggested Yogesh Patki, and senior advocate Mihir Desai for the intervention that HC had enough strength to provide consequential assistance if gr was ruled out.
“The centralized acceptance process can be followed for this year.
Also,” he added.
The judge said the hat, which had been operating over the past few years, was based on choices.
They did not agree with Advocate General Ashutosh Kumbhakoni under CEP.
They are “not impressed ‘by submitting that one CET two hours will not reduce students.
The judges said students who were not vaccinated for Covid-19 were forced to appear as a violation of CET and more specifically the SOP was released.
They will” bring risk to their lives By describing themselves “if they take CET.” Life is more important than the choice of students to get entrance tickets in the preferred junior college which is even the opposite will be guaranteed by the method of registration caps with subject to the benefits of each student, “he added.
They noted that ICSE, CBSE and IGCSE boards in their letters to the state “have agreed to participate in CET examination voluntarily or not and have provided advice to eliminate” CET for various reasons.
“Given the protest made by the council, in our view, there are no goals and objects to be achieved if CET examination is allowed to be held,” Judges concluded.
They refused the country’s request to remain verdict, “given the facts involved and the right to the life of students.”
HC Bombay Quashes Cet to enter class XI
