Indore: Indore Bangku High Court Madhya Pradesh has observed that the law currently dealing with children under the age of 16 in cases of cruel crimes such as adolescents are “truly inadequate and inadequate and inadequate and inadequate and not having equipment “.
The court also made spicy observations about the legislature, saying there were no lessons learned from the NIRBHaya case “because the age of a child is still maintained under 16 years in a vile violation below Part 15 of the 2015 law, giving hands free for delinquency below 16 years old to violate Helin “.
It wonders “how many sacrifices are needed”.
“So, apparently, despite committing a vile violation, the Petitioner (15-year-old boy) will be tried as a teenager just because he is less than 16 years old,” said justice Subodh Abhyankar.
He made observations on June 25 while dismissing the criminal revised petition on the guarantee sought by a 15-year-old boy who was accused of raping a 10-year-old girl in Jhabua.
He was detained on January 21 and since it was at home.
The Boy Guarantee Tree was rejected by the Juji Justice Council in February 2.
He appealed at the Session Court, who uphold the JJ Council’s decision on March 2, after that the bladder advice submitted a criminal revision petition in HC.
The judge said that if the defendant got a guarantee, the survivor would not be safe because he would be protected by the JJ Law.
The court rejected the boy’s petition, saying that he had on January 10 raping a 10-year and four-month-old girl, leaving her bleeding profusely.
He needed blood transfusions and surgical correction at my indore hospital.
The applicant suspected of introducing him and threatened him by revealing evil to anyone, the judge said, showing that his behavior “clearly revealed that he committed a full awareness and could not be said that it was committed to ignorance”.
“Violations of rape, is careless, cannot be done unless someone has specific knowledge about the same thing,” said Abyankar Judge, observed that the girl could not be said to be safe and safe if he was released by guarantee, “especially when he enjoyed the protection of law Connect teen justice “.
HC: JJ acts inadequate for crime with the 16s
